Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SCHUTTE v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90

  GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 18015/03

  The Government submitted that the case differed from a number of previous Austrian cases concerning Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (Gradinger v. Austria, judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-C; Franz Fischer v. Austria, no. 37950/97, 29 May 2001; and Sailer v. Austria, no. 38237/97, June 2002).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 18015/03

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 02.09.2021 - C-117/20

  Generalanwalt Bobek schlägt eine einheitliche Prüfung für den Schutz gegen …

  51 Siehe z. B. EGMR, Urteile vom 30. Mai 2002, W. F. / Österreich (CE:ECHR:2002:0530JUD003827597, § 28); vom 6. Juni 2002, Sailer / Österreich (CE:ECHR:2002:0606JUD003823797, § 28); vom 2. September 2004, Bachmaier / Österreich (CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC00774130); vom 14. September 2004, Rosenquist / Schweden (CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC006061900); vom 7. Dezember 2006, Hauser-Sporn / Österreich (CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD003730103, § 45); vom 1. Februar 2007, Storbråten / Norwegen (CE:ECHR:2007:0201DEC001227704); vom 26. Juli 2007, Schutte / Österreich (CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD001801503, § 42); vom 11. Dezember 2007, Haarvig / Norwegen (CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC001118705); und vom 4. März 2008, Garretta / Frankreich (CE:ECHR:2008:0304DEC000252904, § 86).
• EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 11568/08

  JENIK v. AUSTRIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS

  The Court lastly considers that the issue of excessive length of court proceedings has been dealt with by the Court in numerous cases - also against the respondent Government - in which the principles of the reasonable time requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention have been laid down, and that the Court has already specified the obligation which arises under the Convention for the respondent Government with regard to the lack of an effective remedy against excessively long court proceedings (see Stempfer v. Austria, no. 18294/03, § 48, 26 July 2007; Schutte v. Austria, no. 18015/03, § 38, 26 July 2007; Vitzthum v. Austria, no. 8140/04, § 31, 26 July 2007, and Hauser-Spor v. Austria, no. 37301/03, § 40, 7 December 2006).