Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18666/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,21260) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SALMON MENESES v. ITALY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 12489/86
Windisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18666/91
The Commission recalls that the question of the admissibility of evidence and of its probative value is primarily governed by the rules of domestic law, and as a general rule it is for the national courts and in particular the courts of first instance, to assess the evidence before them, as well as the evidence which the accused seeks to adduce (see Eur. Court H. R., Edwards judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A, no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, para. 34; Windisch judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186, p. 10, para. 25). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18666/91
As regards the refusal to hear a witness, the Commission recalls that it is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to call a witness (see Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89).
- EKMR, 15.01.1996 - 25982/94
FLANDERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (cf. No. 7306/75, Dec. 6.10.76, D.R. 7 p. 115; and No. 18666/91, Dec. 30.11.94, unpublished).