Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 21.01.2020

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09, 33731/14, 2297/15, 6594/15, 19/16, 21260/16, 67897/16, 56941/17   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,300
EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09, 33731/14, 2297/15, 6594/15, 19/16, 21260/16, 67897/16, 56941/17 (https://dejure.org/2020,300)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.01.2020 - 36963/09, 33731/14, 2297/15, 6594/15, 19/16, 21260/16, 67897/16, 56941/17 (https://dejure.org/2020,300)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Januar 2020 - 36963/09, 33731/14, 2297/15, 6594/15, 19/16, 21260/16, 67897/16, 56941/17 (https://dejure.org/2020,300)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,300) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SAIDOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09
    As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish whether they were actually incurred and whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09
    The Court has found on many occasions that in a situation of enforced disappearance, the close relatives of the victim may themselves be victims of treatment in violation of Article 3. The essence of such a violation does not mainly lie in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member but rather concerns the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

    ORHAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09
    The Court has found on many occasions that in a situation of enforced disappearance, the close relatives of the victim may themselves be victims of treatment in violation of Article 3. The essence of such a violation does not mainly lie in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member but rather concerns the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

    LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09
    The Court has found on a number of occasions that unacknowledged detention is a complete negation of the guarantees contained in Article 5 of the Convention and discloses a particularly grave violation of its provisions (see Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, § 164, 27 February 2001, and Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 122, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

    HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09
    The Court stresses that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of use of lethal force by agents of the State in compliance with the Article 2 of the Convention standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 108, 4 May 2001, and Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, § 167, ECHR 2011).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94

    CICEK v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 36963/09
    The Court has found on a number of occasions that unacknowledged detention is a complete negation of the guarantees contained in Article 5 of the Convention and discloses a particularly grave violation of its provisions (see Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, § 164, 27 February 2001, and Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 122, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,306
EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16 (https://dejure.org/2020,306)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.01.2020 - 19/16 (https://dejure.org/2020,306)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Januar 2020 - 19/16 (https://dejure.org/2020,306)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,306) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IDRISOVA v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16
    The essence of such a violation lies not so much in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather in the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

    The Court further finds that loss of earnings applies to close relatives of disappeared persons, including spouses, elderly parents and minor children (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006- XIII (extracts)).

  • EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

    ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16
    A summary of the principles relating to the requirements of such investigation can be found in Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey ([GC], no. 24014/05, §§ 169-82, 14 April 2015), and Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 5878/08, §§ 229-39, ECHR 2016).
  • EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 36367/09

    KAGIROV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16
    Conversely, where the applicants failed to make a prima facie case, the burden of proof could not be reversed (see, for example, Kagirov v. Russia, no. 36367/09, § 92, 23 April 2015).
  • EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

    ORHAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16
    The essence of such a violation lies not so much in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather in the authorities" reactions and attitudes to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 17054/06

    ALIKHANOVY v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16
    Regard being had to the seriousness of the alleged offence and the importance of taking prompt investigative steps, such a delay seems unacceptable (see, for a similar situation, Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 96, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts), and Alikhanovy v. Russia, no. 17054/06, § 81, 28 August 2018).
  • EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 58055/10

    DOSHUYEVA AND YUSUPOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 19/16
    Considering the time frame in which the application was lodged (see Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 165, ECHR 2009), along with the applicant's active attempts to have the disappearance of her husband investigated (see paragraphs 50 and 51 above), the Court does not consider that the lack of a criminal investigation into the incident between 18 January and 17 November 2015 should be held against her or interpreted as a failure on her part either to demonstrate due diligence or to comply with the six-month requirement (contrast Doshuyeva and Yusupov v. Russia, no. 58055/10, 31 May 2016).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht