Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2002,35433
EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02 (https://dejure.org/2002,35433)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.07.2002 - 20862/02 (https://dejure.org/2002,35433)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Juli 2002 - 20862/02 (https://dejure.org/2002,35433)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,35433) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (112)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 51585/99

    HORVAT v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
    The Court recalls that in the Horvat case (see Horvat v. Croatia no. 51585/99, 26 July 2001, §§ 41-43, 45, ECHR - 2002...), it found that the proceedings pursuant to Section 59(4) of the 1999 Constitutional Court's Act were considered as being instituted only if the Constitutional Court, after a preliminary examination of the complaint, decided to admit it.

    (see Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, 26 July 2001, §§ 41-43, 45, ECHR - 2002...).

  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

    VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
    It has further recognised that the rule of exhaustion is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; in reviewing whether it has been observed it is essential to have regard to the particular circumstances of each individual case (see, for example, the Van Oosterwijk v. Belgium judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 18, § 35).
  • EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

    CARDOT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
    Accordingly, the Court has recognised that Article 35 § 1 (formerly Article 26) must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see, for example, the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34).
  • EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 17229/04

    ZIVALJEVIC v. MONTENEGRO

    Having regard to the fact that the Government have submitted no case-law to the contrary, the Court considers that a constitutional appeal cannot be considered an available remedy in respect of length of proceedings complaints due to there being no "individual decision" against which such an appeal could be lodged (see, mutatis mutandis, Mijuskovic v. Montenegro, cited above, § 74; and, a contrario, Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII).

    no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII) and Nogolica v. Croatia (cited above), a constitutional complaint was accepted by the Court as an effective remedy for length of proceedings cases which were still pending before the domestic courts in Croatia.

  • EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

    CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

    The Court had previously adopted the same position and had examined the effectiveness of a remedy before the practice of the domestic courts could be determined in Croatian cases which were similar in substance, (see, Nogolica, cited above, and Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII).
  • EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 40756/06

    VLAD AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

    57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Fernández-Molina González and Others v. Spain (dec.), nos.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht