Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JULY ET SARL LIBERATION c. FRANCE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 10 Partiellement irrecevable Dommage matériel - réparation Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JULY AND SARL LIBERATION v. FRANCE [Extracts]
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 10 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch) - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Wird zitiert von ... (43) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90
PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
{0>La presse représente en effet l'un des moyens dont disposent les responsables politiques et l'opinion publique pour s'assurer que les juges s'acquittent de leurs hautes responsabilités conformément au but constitutif de la mission qui leur est confiée (Prager et Oberschlick c. Autriche, arrêt du 26 avril 1995, série A no 313, § 34).The press is one of the means by which politicians and public opinion can verify that judges are discharging their heavy responsibilities in a manner that is in conformity with the aim which is the basis of the task entrusted to them (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 34, Series A no. 313).<0}.
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
La marge d'appréciation des autorités nationales se trouve ainsi circonscrite par l'intérêt d'une société démocratique à permettre à la presse de jouer son rôle indispensable de «chien de garde» (voir, par exemple, l'arrêt Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c. Norvège [GC], no 21980/93, § 59, CEDH 1999-III).The national margin of appreciation is thus circumscribed by the interests of a democratic society in enabling the press to exercise its vital role of "public watchdog" (see, for example, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-III).<0}.
- EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
It must be taken into consideration, moreover, that the first applicant, who at the time was the publication director of the national daily newspaper Libération and manager of the second applicant (the company SARL Libération), is a well-informed professional in press circles who had previously had to appear before competent domestic courts in respect of such offences (see Tourancheau and July v. France, no. 53886/00, 24 November 2005 and, more recently, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, ECHR 2007-XI).
- EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 58729/00
ABEBERRY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
It reiterates its previous case-law to the effect that these provisions fulfilled the requirements of accessibility and foreseeability within the meaning of Article 10 § 2 of the Convention (see Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, §§ 45-49, ECHR 2004-VI; Brasilier v. France, no. 71343/01, § 28, 11 April 2006; Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, § 18, ECHR 2006-XIII; and, mutatis mutandis, Abeberry v. France, (dec.) no. 58729/00, 21 September 2004), and thus does not see any reason to depart from its case-law on this point. - EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 53984/00
RADIO FRANCE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
Secondly, the Court of Appeal found that by "choosing, as to the form, to report [the matter] by adopting a style other than that of an interview, the author could not have been unaware that the parts of the article not placed between inverted commas could be attributed to her", whereas a general requirement for journalists systematically and formally to distance themselves from the content of a quotation that might insult or provoke others or damage their reputation is not reconcilable with the press's role of providing information on current events, opinions and ideas (see Thoma, cited above, § 64, and Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, ECHR 2004-II). - EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 53886/00
TOURANCHEAU ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
It must be taken into consideration, moreover, that the first applicant, who at the time was the publication director of the national daily newspaper Libération and manager of the second applicant (the company SARL Libération), is a well-informed professional in press circles who had previously had to appear before competent domestic courts in respect of such offences (see Tourancheau and July v. France, no. 53886/00, 24 November 2005 and, more recently, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, ECHR 2007-XI).
- OLG Frankfurt, 13.10.2016 - 16 W 57/16
Haftung eines Bloggers bei Wiedergabe der Aussage eines Dritten
Insoweit reicht aus Sicht des Lesers als hinreichende Distanzierung aus, dass die Beklagte hier die angegriffene Äußerung eindeutig als Zitat kenntlich gemacht hat [vgl. BVerfG Beschl. v. 25.6.2009 aaO. - Rn. 67; EGMR (III. Sektion) Urt. v. 14.2.2008 - 20893/03 - Affaire July u. Sari Libération/Frankreich - Rn. 73]. - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.04.2011 - C-70/10
Rechtsangleichung
102 - Vgl. insbesondere EGMR, Urteil Chappel, § 56. Vgl. auch EGMR, Urteile Bock und Palade gegen Rumänien vom 15. Februar 2007, Beschwerde Nr. 21740/02, §§ 61 bis 64, July und Libération gegen Frankreich vom 14. Februar 2008, Beschwerde Nr. 20893/03, § 55, und Brunet-Lecomte u. a. gegen Frankreich vom 5. Februar 2009, Beschwerde Nr. 42117/04, § 42. - EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 33677/10
FÜRST-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA
Nonetheless, civil servants acting in an official capacity may nevertheless be subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than ordinary citizens (see with further references, July and SARL Libération v. France, no. 20893/03, § 74, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).The Chamber refers (in paragraph 46) to July and SARL Libération v. France (no. 20893/03, § 74, ECHR 2008 (extracts)) and (in paragraph 47) to Janowski v. Poland ([GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999-I).
- EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 346/04
MUSTAFA ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Consequently, whilst it cannot be said that they knowingly laid themselves open to close scrutiny of their every word and deed to the extent to which politicians do and should therefore be treated on an equal footing with the latter when it comes to the criticism of their actions, members of the judiciary acting in an official capacity, as in the present case, may nevertheless be subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than ordinary citizens (see, for example, July and SARL Libération v. France, no. 20893/03, § 74, ECHR 2008 (extracts)). - EGMR, 28.06.2012 - 15054/07
RESSIOT ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
La Cour estime qu'en l'occurrence le constat de manquement figurant dans le présent arrêt constitue en soi une satisfaction équitable suffisante (Paturel c. France, no 54968/00, § 55, 22 décembre 2005 et July et Sarl Libération c. France, no 20893/03, § 89, CEDH 2008 (extraits). - EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 61949/08
SEFERI YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
Les journalistes doivent cependant agir de bonne foi, sur la base de faits exacts, et fournir des informations « fiables et précises'dans le respect de l'éthique journalistique (Fressoz et Roire c. France [GC], no 29183/95, § 54, CEDH 1999-I, Radio France et autres c. France, no 53984/00, § 37, CEDH 2004-II, et July et Sarl Libération c. France, no 20893/03, § 69, CEDH 2008). - EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 57195/17
Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf privates Familienleben: Maddie McCann's Eltern …
Il faut ajouter à cela que la CEDH, dans des situations similaires, tient surtout compte de l'importance pour le bon fonctionnement de la justice d'avoir la coopération d'un public éclairé et bien informé (voir les arrêts Saygili et autres c. Turquie [no 19353/03, 8 janvier 2008] et July et SARL Libération c. France, no 20893/03 [CEDH 2008 (extraits)]). - EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 1759/08
KABOGLU ET ORAN c. TURQUIE
Les journalistes doivent cependant agir de bonne foi, sur la base de faits exacts, et fournir des informations « fiables et précises'dans le respect de l'éthique journalistique (Fressoz et Roire c. France [GC], no 29183/95, § 54, CEDH 1999-I, Radio France et autres c. France, no 53984/00, § 37, CEDH 2004-II, et July et Sarl Libération c. France, no 20893/03, § 69, CEDH 2008). - EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 19452/02
ANDREESCU c. ROUMANIE
Elle renvoie à cet égard aux principes fondamentaux qui se dégagent de sa jurisprudence en la matière (voir, parmi de nombreux autres, Tourancheau et July c. France, no 53886/00, §§ 64 à 68, 24 novembre 2005, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens et July c. France [GC], nos 21279/02 et 36448/02, §§ 45 et 46, CEDH 2007-XI, et July et Sarl Libération c. France, no 20893/03, CEDH 2008-... (extraits), §§ 60 à 64). - EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 67369/16
RADIO BROADCASTING COMPANY B92 AD v. SERBIA
The Court has recognised the existence of such an interest, for example, when the publication in question concerned information about criminal proceedings in general (see Dupuis and Others v. France, no. 1914/02, § 42, 7 June 2007, and July and SARL Libération v. France, no. 20893/03, § 66, ECHR 2008 (extracts)), information regarding a specific criminal case (see White v. Sweden, no. 42435/02, § 29, 19 September 2006, and Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438/04, § 58, 16 April 2009) or information about the authorities' efforts to combat crime (see Yordanova and Toshev, cited above, § 53). - EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 29313/10
DE CAROLIS ET FRANCE TELEVISIONS c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 57574/14
MILOSAVLJEVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 45083/06
NOVAYA GAZETA AND MILASHINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 20240/08
RUZOVÝ PANTER, O.S. c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 62716/09
LOZOWSKA c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 9142/16
SAGDIÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 5393/04
NICULESCU-DELLAKEZA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 29064/08
FLOQUET ET ESMENARD c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 72068/10
TASKAYA ET ERSOY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 50147/11
REICHMAN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 34050/05
HAGUENAUER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 16695/19
KOZAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 30343/10
GHERGUT c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 31566/13
TAVARES DE ALMEIDA FERNANDES AND ALMEIDA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 32563/04
ILEANA CONSTANTINESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 42117/04
BRUNET-LECOMTE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 47542/07
BRZEZINSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 17265/05
BRUNET-LECOMTE ET LYON MAG' c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 63029/19
SARISU PEHLIVAN c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 10611/18
BÉCHIS c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 23534/12
KOSINSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 40858/09
A. MOKSEL A.G. c. GRECE
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 44164/10
MALVOISIN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 29784/06
FLEURY c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 28487/06
MARGALET c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 42396/04
TAFFIN ET CONTRIBUABLES ASSOCIES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 75300/01
IEREMEIOV v. ROMANIA (No. 1)
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
IEREMEIOV v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 11.05.2023 - 18287/18
SÀRL GATOR c. MONACO
- EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 19994/10
WÓJCIK c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 1647/09
CADOT c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 53628/10
BARTNIK c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 41486/04
SELECKIS c. LETTONIE
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.03.2013 - 38410/97, 40373/98, 69678/01, 8112/02, 97/03, 20893/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FONTAINE ET BERTIN ET 4 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA FRANCE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FONTAINE AND BERTIN AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST FRANCE
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 29.06.1998 - 38410/97
- EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 38410/97
- EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 38410/97
- EGMR, 07.03.2013 - 38410/97, 40373/98, 69678/01, 8112/02, 97/03, 20893/03