Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (5)
- Wolters Kluwer
Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische Sicherheitskräfte - Anforderungen an die Rechtfertigung einer den Tod eines anderern versursachenden Gewaltanwendung i.S.d. Art. 2 Abs. 2 Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (EMRK) - Pflicht zur ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OGUR v. TURKEY
Art. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Preliminary objection rejected (estoppel) Violation of Art. 2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OGUR c. TURQUIE
Art. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Exception préliminaire rejetée (forclusion) Violation de l'Art. 2 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 21594/93
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93
Papierfundstellen
- NJW 2001, 1991
Wird zitiert von ... (177)
- EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15
Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht
Der Gerichtshof hält es zwar für wünschenswert, dass Ermittlungen bezüglich der Anwendung von Zwang durch die Polizei möglichst von unabhängigen und separaten Einheiten geführt werden (siehe z. B. Ogur v. Turkey [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 21594/93, Rdnr. 91, ECHR 1999-III und Eremiásová und Pechová, a. a. O., Rdnrn. 135-39), er kann jedoch keine hinreichende hierarchische, institutionelle oder praktische Verbindung zwischen dem ermittelnden Dezernat und dem USK feststellen, die für sich genommen dazu geführt hätte, dass die Ermittlungen unzuverlässig oder ineffektiv waren. - BVerfG, 26.06.2014 - 2 BvR 2699/10
Klageerzwingungsverfahren (erfolglose Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen die Einstellung …
Wirksame Ermittlungen müssen prompt, umfassend, unvoreingenommen und gründlich sein (…vgl. EGMR, McCann u.a./Vereinigtes Königreich, a.a.O., Rn. 163) und darüber hinaus geeignet, zur Identifizierung und Bestrafung der verantwortlichen Person zu führen (vgl. EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Mai 1999, Nr. 21554/93 [richtig: 21594/93 - d. Red.] , Ogur/Türkei, NJW 2001, S. 1991 ;… EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. April 2012, Nr. 9829/07, Ali Günes/Türkei, NVwZ 2013, S. 1599, Rn. 45). - BVerfG, 06.10.2014 - 2 BvR 1568/12
Einstellung der Ermittlungen nach dem Tod einer Offiziersanwärterin auf der …
Sie müssen darüber hinaus geeignet sein, zur Identifizierung und Bestrafung der verantwortlichen Person zu führen (vgl. EGMR , Ogur v. Türkei, Urteil vom 20. Mai 1999, Nr. 21594/93, NJW 2001, S. 1991 ).
- BVerfG, 23.03.2015 - 2 BvR 1304/12
Klageerzwingungsverfahren (erfolglose Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen die Einstellung …
Sie müssen darüber hinaus geeignet sein, zur Identifizierung und Bestrafung der verantwortlichen Person zu führen (vgl. EGMR , Ogur v. Türkei, Urteil vom 20. Mai 1999, Nr. 21554/93 [richtig: 21594/93 - d. Red.] , NJW 2001, S. 1991 ). - EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94
AKTAS v. TURKEY
The provincial administration council had only become aware of the case on 29 November 1990, several days after Yakup Aktas's death; in any event, for the reasons stated in the Court's OÄ?ur v. Turkey judgment of 20 May 1999 (no. 21594/93, ECHR 1999-III, § 91), this administrative body could not be considered independent and was unlikely to instigate effective investigative measures.For an investigation into an alleged unlawful killing by State agents to be effective, it may generally be regarded as necessary for the persons responsible for and carrying out the investigation to be independent from those implicated in the events (Güleç v. Turkey judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, §§ 81-82, and OÄ?ur, cited above, no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III).
The Court recalls that in the Kurt judgment (cited above, p. 1195, §§ 174-75) the sum of GBP 15, 000 was awarded for violations of the Convention under Articles 5 and 13 in respect of the disappearance of the applicant's son while in custody, which sum was to be held by the applicant for her son and his heirs, while the applicant received an award of GBP 10, 000 in her own favour, due to the circumstances of the case which had led the Court to find a breach of Articles 3 and 13. In the present case, the Court has held, in addition to breaches of Articles 5 and 13, that there has been a violation of the right to respect for life guaranteed under Article 2 and torture contrary to Article 3. Noting the awards made in previous cases from south-east Turkey concerning these provisions (see, concerning Article 3, the Aksoy judgment cited above, pp. 2289-90, § 113, the Aydin judgment cited above, p. 1903, § 131, the Tekin judgment cited above, pp. 1521-22, § 77; and, concerning Article 2, the Kaya judgment cited above, p. 333, § 122, the Güleç v. Turkey judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1734, § 88, the Ergi v. Turkey judgment of 28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1785, § 110, the Yasa judgment cited above, pp. 2444-45, § 124, and OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 98, ECHR 1999-III) and having regard to the circumstances of this case, the Court has decided to award the sum of GBP 25, 000 in total in respect of non-pecuniary damage to be held by the applicant for his brother's heirs.".
As regards non-pecuniary damage,... the Court has held that there has been a substantive and a procedural violation of Article 2. Noting the awards made in previous cases involving the application of the same provision in south-eastern Turkey (see the Kaya judgment cited above, p. 333, § 122; the Güleç judgment cited above, p. 1734, § 88; the Ergi v. Turkey judgment of 28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1785, § 110; the Yasa judgment cited above, pp. 2444-45, § 124; and OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 98, ECHR 1999-III) and having regard to the circumstances of this case, the Court awards the sum of GBP 20, 000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, to be held by the applicant on behalf of his son's widow and four children.".
- BVerfG, 04.02.2010 - 2 BvR 2307/06
Klageerzwingungsverfahren (Wiederaufnahme der Ermittlungen); Recht auf Leben …
Sie müssen darüber hinaus geeignet sein, zur Identifizierung und Bestrafung der verantwortlichen Person zu führen (vgl. EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Mai 1999, Nr. 21554/93 [richtig: 21594/93 - d. Red.] , Ogur/Türkei, NJW 2001, S. 1991 ). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
For an investigation into alleged unlawful killing by State agents to be effective, the persons responsible for and carrying out the investigation must be independent and impartial, in law and in practice (see Güleç v. Turkey, judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1733, §§ 81-82; OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III; and Ergi v. Turkey, judgment of 28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp. 1778-79, §§ 83-84). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
2444-2445, § 124, OÄŸur c. Turquie [GC], no 21594/93, § 98, CEDH 1999-III) et tenant compte des circonstances de l'affaire, la Cour décide d'accorder en réparation du dommage moral une somme de 25 000 GBP, que le requérant détiendra pour les héritiers de son frère (...) ".2444-2445, § 124, et OÄŸur c. Turquie [GC], no 21594/93, § 98, CEDH 1999-III), et tenant compte des circonstances de l'affaire, la Cour décide d'allouer, en réparation du dommage moral, une somme de 20 000 GBP, que le requérant détiendra pour la veuve et les quatre enfants de son fils (...) ".
- EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02
Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua
What distinguished the present case from Ergi v. Turkey (28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV), OÄ?ur v. Turkey ([GC], no. 21594/93, ECHR 1999-III) and Makaratzis (cited above) was the fact that, in the context of the G8, the planning of operations had inevitably been incomplete and approximate, given that the demonstrators could either have remained peaceful or have engaged in violence. - EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI
For an investigation into alleged unlawful killing by State agents to be effective, it may generally be regarded as necessary for the persons responsible for and carrying out the investigation to be independent from those implicated in the events (see, for example, Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III; Giuliani and Gaggio, cited above, § 300; Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 177). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17
NIKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11
Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt
- EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10
SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2009 - 16064/90
VARNAVA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 32715/06
Kübler ./. Deutschland
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 34056/02
GONGADZE c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01
TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 50939/99
BAKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00
ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 14.05.2009 - 21810/03
TAYSUMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06
ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98
VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09
DURDEVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 63543/09
DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 16281/10
AYDAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 40094/05
VIRABYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00
ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 24014/05
MUSTAFA TUNÇ ET FECIRE TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 40485/08
PETROVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 21689/93
AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 36552/05
ZAYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05
TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07
LENEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 23016/04
ER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04
PREMININY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2001 - 37453/97
AKMAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95
FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 48939/99
ÖNERYILDIZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32245/19
MACHALIKASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 22931/09
BEHÇET SÖGÜT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 20147/15
OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 45744/08
JASINSKIS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 22746/03
ÖLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 2952/06
MUTSOLGOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 43233/02
MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 3179/05
GAKIYEV AND GAKIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.02.2009 - 21080/05
VAGAPOVA AND ZUBIRAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 43393/98
MATKO v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 23551/10
ÖZPOLAT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 18071/05
MASKHADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 14662/07
EDILOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 7964/07
MAAYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 2220/05
VAKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.05.2009 - 12417/05
TURLUYEVA AND KHAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 4571/04
ISRAILOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 41498/04
SAYDALIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 5285/04
NASUKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 44587/98
ISAAK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.04.2005 - 64663/01
LO TUFO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97
ADALI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.05.2000 - 20764/92
ERTAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 24655/18
BARANIN AND VUKCEVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 12008/06
ALEKSEY BORISOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09
KHATAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 36832/97
SOLOMOU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 36088/97
ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 26307/95
TAHSIN ACAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 10653/10
HUSEYNOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 20347/07
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKÇILERI SENDIKASI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 34085/06
VELKHIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03
GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 12157/05
LIIVIK v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 26144/95
IKINCISOY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.12.2017 - 17249/10
GJIKONDI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 36894/04
ZALYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 5269/08
SHCHIBORSHCH AND KUZMINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 35985/09
MARTIN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 23445/03
ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 26246/05
IORGA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 27065/05
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 41515/04
IDALOVA AND IDALOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 51210/99
NEHYET GÜNAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 8663/08
BOYCHENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 48532/11
NIHAT SOYLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 27217/06
ZINOVCHIK c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 47532/09
HAKIM IPEK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 44297/06
MEZHIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 28732/09
SANSAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08
ALIYEVA AND ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 32277/07
DEKIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 39912/09
FERENCÍKOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 36150/04
DAMAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
MLADENOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 48132/07
ANDREYEV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45388/99
KALLIS AND ANDROULLA PANAYI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.02.2008 - 57084/00
USTA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 41964/98
CENNET AYHAN AND MEHMET SALIH AYHAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 38595/97
KAKOULLI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.04.2005 - 64731/01
GÖKTEPE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 67124/01
CICEK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 34491/97
CEYHAN DEMIR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 35875/97
SIRIN YILMAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 34592/97
AGDAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 4561/17
ASPIOTIS c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 33862/17
KHAYAURI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09
MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09
GASIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 35152/09
DALAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 32036/13
TRESKAVICA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33619/04
SOKURENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 17380/09
PAPAPETROU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 47357/08
ALIKAJ ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 1572/07
NASUKHANOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 35079/04
SASITA ISRAILOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 18825/02
DMITRACHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 35052/04
ZABIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 7654/02
AYUBOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 27183/03
ZAURBEKOVA AND ZAURBEKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 27243/03
MUSIKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 27233/03
BERSUNKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 22057/02
YUSUPOVA AND ZAURBEKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02
SAYA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 54182/00
HALIT CELEBI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.03.2006 - 50939/99
BAKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.07.2005 - 50575/99
DE LANDSHEER c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 49525/99
DUMONT c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96
ÖZALP AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.03.2004 - 47650/99
SILVESTER'S HORECA SERVICE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12
SHURIYYA ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 03.10.2019 - 50283/13
FOUNTAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 29729/09
KHAYRULLINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09
MATEVOSYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 24494/06
GÜNES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 55744/09
RASMAN ET VELISCEK c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 37537/07
HAJRULAHU v.
- EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 16664/07
ABAKAROVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 49097/08
A.A. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 49076/06
MATAYEVA AND DADAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 11564/07
MURTAZOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 11528/07
TAYMUSKHANOVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 22932/02
ISMAIL ALTUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 33264/04
KHALITOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 1586/05
DZHABRAILOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 44803/04
PETROPOULOU-TSAKIRIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 57049/00
YÜKSEL ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.06.2001 - 35875/97
YILMAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.08.2000 - 32457/96
ÖZALP AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 69450/10
KHABIROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 78019/17
GASANGUSENOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 4133/16
AHMET TUNÇ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 46797/08
KALICKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.03.2015 - 9935/06
NALBANDYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 2527/09
KOSUMOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 31682/07
KHAMZATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 36156/04
BITIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 11830/03
GHARIBASHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 39436/98
CANAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 75632/01
EKREM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 32597/96
HALIT DINÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 9785/02
ULUMASKAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.07.2005 - 52098/99
LEROY c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 50236/99
ROBYNS DE SCHNEIDAUER c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 51788/99
DE STAERKE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 52112/99
REYNTIENS c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 36217/97
MENTESE AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 22876/93
SEMSI ONEN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 8347/05
BENUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 12457/05
REZVANOV AND REZVANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.03.2004 - 36217/97
MENTESE and OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 68238/01
V.D. & C.G. c. FRANCE
Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 21594/93 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OGUR contre la TURQUIE
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 21594/93
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93