Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 11.12.2003

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,52706
EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03 (https://dejure.org/2005,52706)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.05.2005 - 2448/03 (https://dejure.org/2005,52706)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. Mai 2005 - 2448/03 (https://dejure.org/2005,52706)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,52706) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    Whilst it is true that the fact that a remedy does not lead to an outcome favourable to the applicant does not render a remedy ineffective (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI), the Court concludes that the practice of the Constitutional Court in the circumstances of the present case rendered an otherwise effective remedy ineffective.
  • EGMR, 09.11.2000 - 43434/98

    COBIANCHI c. ITALIE (N° 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    Furthermore, it is the Court's well-established practice that the proceedings following an appeal on points of law or an appeal for cassation fall within the scope of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, H.E. v. Austria, no. 33505/96, §§ 14 and 18, 11 July 2002; and Cobianchi v. Italy (no. 1), no. 43434/98, §§ 8 and 11, 9 November 2000).
  • EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99

    METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    However, such a remedy is required only for complaints that can be regarded as "arguable" under the Convention (see Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 137, ECHR 2001-XII).
  • EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02

    SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    The Court further recalls that a constitutional complaint under section 63 of the Constitutional Court Act was recognised to be an effective remedy for the length of proceedings still pending in Croatia (see Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII).
  • EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 33505/96

    H.E. v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    Furthermore, it is the Court's well-established practice that the proceedings following an appeal on points of law or an appeal for cassation fall within the scope of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, H.E. v. Austria, no. 33505/96, §§ 14 and 18, 11 July 2002; and Cobianchi v. Italy (no. 1), no. 43434/98, §§ 8 and 11, 9 November 2000).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 77562/01

    SAN LEONARD BAND CLUB CONTRE MALTE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 2448/03
    The Court firstly observes that the actual name given to the proceedings in the domestic legal system or the fact that the national jurisdictions have considered them as an extraordinary remedy cannot be considered determinant: what is decisive is the nature and the scope of the proceedings at issue (see San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 41, ECHR 2004-...).
  • EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 55759/07

    MARESTI v. CROATIA

    In this connection, the Court notes that it has already found that Article 6 is applicable to proceedings concerning such an appeal (see Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 21 and 22, 26 May 2005).

    To date, the Court has dealt with a number of Croatian cases where an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court against a final judgment delivered in civil proceedings has been regarded as a remedy requiring exhaustion (see, for example, Blecic v. Croatia, no. 59532/00, §§ 22-24, 29 July 2004; Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 10 and 11, 26 May 2005; and Pitra v. Croatia, no. 41075/02, § 9, 16 June 2005).

  • EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 25282/06

    DOLENEC v. CROATIA

    So far, the Court has dealt with a number of Croatian cases where an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court against a final judgment adopted in the course of civil proceedings has been regarded as a remedy to be exhausted (see, for example, Blecic v. Croatia, no. 59532/00, §§ 22-24, 29 July 2004; Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 10 and 11, 26 May 2005; and Pitra v. Croatia, no. 41075/02, § 9, 16 June 2005).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 2448/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2003,56266
EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 2448/03 (https://dejure.org/2003,56266)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11.12.2003 - 2448/03 (https://dejure.org/2003,56266)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11. Dezember 2003 - 2448/03 (https://dejure.org/2003,56266)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,56266) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht