Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1+14, Art. 14 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion) No violation of Art. 3 in respect of trial No violation of Art. 6-1 in respect of trial Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1+14 No violation of Art. 3 in respect of sentence No violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
V. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1+14, Art. 14 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Non-violation de l'art. 3 quant au procès Violation de l'art. 6-1 quant au procès Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6-1+14 Non-violation de l'art. 3 quant à la peine Non-violation de l'art. 5-1 Violation de l'art. 6-1 ...
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 06.03.1998 - 24888/94
- EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Wird zitiert von ... (179)
- EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 27765/09
Italiens Flüchtlingspolitik: Rechte auch auf hoher See
To reply to that question, account must be taken of the purpose and meaning of the provision at issue, which must themselves be analysed in the light of the principle, firmly rooted in the Court's case-law, that the Convention is a living instrument which must be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions (see, for example, Soering, cited above, § 102; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, Reports 1997-II; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 72, ECHR 1999-IX; and Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 22978/05
Gäfgen - Folter bei polizeilicher Vernehmung; Kindesentführung; Geständnis trotz …
Die Art der angeblich vom Beschwerdeführer begangenen Straftat ist daher für die Zwecke des Artikels 3 nicht erheblich (siehe V. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24888/94, Rdnr. 69, ECHR 1999-IX;… Ramirez Sanchez ./. Frankreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 59450/00, Rdnr. 116, ECHR 2006-IX;… und Saadi ./. Italien [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 37201/06, Rdnr. 127, ECHR 2008-...). - EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
52. As regards the types of "treatment" which fall within the scope of Article 3 of the Convention, the Court's case-law refers to "ill-treatment" that attains a minimum level of severity and involves actual bodily injury or intense physical or mental suffering (see the above-cited Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment, p. 66, § 167; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC] no. 24888/94, ECHR 1999-IX, § 71).
- EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00
D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
It is for the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that an effective remedy was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time; that is to say, that the remedy was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 60367/08
Khamtokhu und Aksenchik ./. Russland: Lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe nur für Männer …
The Court reiterates that matters of appropriate sentencing fall in principle outside the scope of the Convention, it not being its role to decide, for example, what is the appropriate term of detention applicable to a particular offence (see Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, § 105, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716/00, ECHR 2001-VI; T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § 117, 16 December 1999; and V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 118, ECHR 1999-IX, and, by contrast, as regards a manifestly disproportionate punishment for ill-treatment, Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 61, 20 December 2007; Okkali v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 73, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); Derman v. Turkey, no. 21789/02, § 28, 31 May 2011). - EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05
N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
However, it must be shown that the risk is real and that the authorities of the receiving State are not able to obviate the risk by providing appropriate protection." Concerning in particular the suffering which flows from naturally occurring illness, physical or mental, the Court has elaborated the so-called 'Pretty threshold' 1 : "52. As regards the types of "treatment" which fall within the scope of Article 3 of the Convention, the Court's case-law refers to "ill-treatment" that attains a minimum level of severity and involves actual bodily injury or intense physical or mental suffering (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom, cited above, p. 66, § 167; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 6587/04
Verstoß gegen das Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit durch die nachträgliche …
Der Gerichtshof hat ferner in Bezug auf die Verhängung einer Strafe festgestellt, dass Fragen des angemessenen Strafmaßes größtenteils nicht in den Anwendungsbereich des Übereinkommens fallen, hat dabei jedoch nicht ausgeschlossen, dass willkürliche oder unverhältnismäßig lange Strafen unter bestimmten Umständen Fragen nach der Konvention aufwerfen können (…siehe u.a. Sawoniuk, a.a.O., hinsichtlich einer lebenslangen Freiheitsstrafe für eine Person gehobenen Alters;… und Weeks, a.a.O., Rdnr. 47; V. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24888/94, Rdnrn. 97 f., ECHR 1999-IX; und T. v. Vereinigtes Königreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24724/94, Rdnrn. 96 f., 16. Dezember 1999, alle drei Urteile hinsichtlich lebenslanger Freiheitsstrafen für Minderjährige). - EGMR, 30.06.2008 - 22978/05
Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Fortwirkung von Verstößen gegen die …
Die Konvention enthält ein absolutes Verbot der Folter und unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Bestrafung, das unabhängig vom Verhalten des Betroffenen gilt (…siehe Chahal ./. Vereinigtes Königreich , Urteil vom 15. November 1996, Urteils- und Entscheidungssammlung 1996-V, S. 1855, Rdnr. 79; V. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24888/94, Rdnr. 69, ECHR 1999-IX;… und Ramirez Sanchez ./. Frankreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 59450/00, Rdnr. 116, ECHR 2006-IX). - EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 66069/09
Überprüfung von lebenslänglichen Haftsstrafen: "Wegsperren für immer" ist in ganz …
As the Court has stated, it is not its role to decide what is the appropriate term of detention applicable to a particular offence or to pronounce on the appropriate length of detention or other sentence which should be served by a person after conviction by a competent court (see T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § 117, 16 December 1999; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 118, ECHR 1999-IX; and Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716/00, ECHR 2001-VI). - EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12
Lampedusa-Haft war illegal
(a) The purpose for which the ill-treatment was inflicted, together with the intention or motivation behind it (see Bouyid, cited above, § 86), although the absence of an intention to humiliate or debase the victim cannot conclusively rule out its characterisation as "degrading" and therefore prohibited by Article 3 (see, among other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III; Price, cited above, § 24; and Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 114)."... account must be taken of the purpose and meaning of the provision in issue, which must themselves be analysed in the light of the principle, firmly rooted in the Court's case-law, that the Convention is a living instrument which must be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions (see, for example, Soering, cited above, § 102; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, Reports 1997-II; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 72, ECHR 1999-IX; and Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-I).
- EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08
Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Recht auf Beschwerde; Verhältnis zwischen …
- EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04
KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE
- EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 39051/03
EMONET ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 70204/01
Erniedrigende Leibesvisitation eines Gefangenen
- EGMR, 15.06.2004 - 60958/00
S.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 27360/04
Schummer ./. Deutschland
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 32541/08
Keine Käfige für Angeklagte
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 22.09.2011 - C-411/10
Nach Generalanwältin Trstenjak dürfen keine Asylbewerber an andere …
- EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93
AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.03.2016 - 47152/06
BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 45603/05
BUDINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 19324/02
LEGER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97
YANKOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 46295/99
STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 05.07.2001 - 41087/98
PHILLIPS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 23502/06
Bomben auf kurdische Dörfer: Türkei muss Schmerzensgeld zahlen
- EGMR, 27.07.2010 - 28221/08
GATT v. MALTA
- EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99
VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 13.09.2001 - 45036/98
BOSPHORUS HAVA YOLLARI TURIZM VE TICARET AS v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 06.02.2003 - 46827/99
MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 07.06.2001 - 64666/01
PAPON v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 30443/03
H. L. gegen Deutschland
- EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 70337/01
GUVEC c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01
POPOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 50390/99
MCGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 29.05.2001 - 63716/00
SAWONIUK contre le ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97
POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 31143/96
INDELICATO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 73593/10
LÁSZLÓ MAGYAR v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 47152/06
BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 52750/99
LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 1704/06
RAMISHVILI AND KOKHREIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 10511/10
MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 15766/03
Oršuš u.a. ./. Kroatien
- EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 2334/03
Kozacioglu ./. Türkei
- EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 9852/03
HUMMATOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 01.03.2001 - 22493/93
BERKTAY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 29896/14
JEVTOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 16318/07
MORETTI ET BENEDETTI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 30033/05
POLONSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 19324/02
LEGER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41220/98
ALIEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 39042/97
KUZNETSOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 35449/16
STECHER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 20136/11
ILIEVSKA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 49806/99
PRODAN c. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 15.06.2000 - 25723/94
ERDOGDU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 68059/13
V.K. v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 64418/10
MIHHAILOV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46793/06
BULDASHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 40631/02
TIMERGALIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 56760/00
AKPINAR AND ALTUN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.05.2001 - 46295/99
STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16
GJINI v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 34015/07
ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 54872/08
KASPEROVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 3933/04
KOPYLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 53025/99
FRANKOWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
ERDOGAN YAGIZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.01.2004 - 50183/99
KOLOSOVSKIY contre la LETTONIE
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41707/98
KHOKHLICH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 25397/09
D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 7505/06
AKKOYUNLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 32541/08
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 18280/04
SHISHKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
ELDAR IMANOV AND AZHDAR IMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2009 - 17020/05
PARADYSZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 38000/05
D. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 21890/03
LEWAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 52058/99
GORODNITCHEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 61222/00
UOTI v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 41124/02
FILIP c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 623/02
KUNZ c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 57325/00
D.H. ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 27.01.2005 - 59450/00
RAMIREZ SANCHEZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 41773/98
SCAVUZZO-HAGER ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 60958/00
S.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 25.09.2003 - 62393/00
KADIKIS contre la LETTONIE (n° 2)
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 40679/98
DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 13.03.2001 - 33179/96
KARATAS contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.02.2021 - 20936/16
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 74884/13
TSARPELAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 2945/16
KHLEBIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 33294/03
AYANGIL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 31225/06
SLUNSKY c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 23661/03
ZIROVNICKÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
POPA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 29.06.2010 - 14102/02
BEKAOURI c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05
M.A.K. AND R.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06
KOIVUSAARI AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 32921/03
KOHLHOFER AND MINARIK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 13637/03
BARTOSINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.08.2009 - 39586/05
A.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 8713/03
JANUS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 22/03
GRIGORYEVSKIKH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 547/02
JERONOVICS c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 12269/02
ERYK KOZLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 31038/06
ANDRYSIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 39519/05
ZBOROWSKI v. POLAND (N° 3)
- EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 45133/06
ZBOROWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 44521/04
KOLODZINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.05.2007 - 35098/03
DYMACEK ET DYMACKOVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 2015/02
JAKUB v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 73233/01
SEBEKOVA AND HORVATOVICOVA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 7548/04
BIANCHI c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 57/03
AL-SHARI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 708/02
FEHR c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 43874/98
LINNEKOGEL c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 20.01.2005 - 4784/03
RAINER c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 07.12.2004 - 53909/00
AYDIN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 54797/00
H.F. c. SLOVAQUIE
- EGMR, 15.06.2004 - 67531/01
GORSHKOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 13.05.2004 - 47796/99
EROL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 42853/98
GÜNERI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 48015/99
EASTERBROOK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 13.05.2003 - 62960/00
ANTOINE contre le ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
HILL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 32574/96
ALGÜR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.05.2001 - 35076/97
EROL contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.03.2001 - 27696/95
YALCIN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 32985/96
ALTAN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 33736/16
SAGURA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11
O.R. AND L.R. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 23229/11
KARACHENTSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 56054/12
KHIDER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 21978/02
LUIGI SERINO c. ITALIE (n° 3)
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 8403/02
MGLOSIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 26744/02
KISIELEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 23204/07
GHAVTADZE c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 9870/07
POGHOSSIAN c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 42716/02
TOMA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 14578/03
ANGHELESCU c. ROUMANIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04
OCHLIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 26846/05
CWIERTNIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 43837/06
MISIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 24322/02
PANUSZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 29366/03
STEPNIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 36161/05
JAKUBIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 38007/02
WARSINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 4612/03
OTOMANSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 69908/01
JASAR v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
- EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 13657/03
TULITA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 74432/01
BULYNKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 39483/98
NAZARENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 54656/00
WALLER and VALE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 73299/01
STANFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 23.03.2021 - 52884/19
KNIGHTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 62309/17
STEEN v. SWEDEN
- EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12
BAGDONAVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 70495/10
LYNCH AND WHELAN v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 577/11
HET FINANCIEELE DAGBLAD B.v. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 46677/06
MINARIK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 3038/03
PYLNEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 44369/02
WENERSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 55525/00
HADRI-VIONNET c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 04.01.2005 - 45454/99
YESILGOZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.05.2003 - 67385/01
WYNNE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 57981/00
SELVANAYAGAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 22186/03
PESKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 20251/04
JANULIS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 9693/02
ALEKSANDR BULYNKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.10.2004 - 968/04
BROWN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 66753/01
BERNARD contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 58853/00
PARTINGTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 06.03.1998 - 24888/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 06.03.1998 - 24888/94
- EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94