Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SYNGELIDIS v. GREECE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 11801/04

  TSALKITZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 24895/07

  The applicant noted that the present case raised an issue concerning parliamentary immunity which had already been resolved by the Court following its judgments in the cases of Cordova v. Italy (no. 1) (no. 40877/98, ECHR 2003-I) and Tsalkitzis v. Greece (no. 11801/04, 16 November 2006).

  This is particularly so where the restrictions on the right of access stem from the resolution of a political body (see Kart v. Turkey, cited above, § 83, and Tsalkitzis v. Greece, no. 11801/04, § 49, 16 November 2006).

• EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 40877/98

  CORDOVA c. ITALIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 24895/07

  The applicant noted that the present case raised an issue concerning parliamentary immunity which had already been resolved by the Court following its judgments in the cases of Cordova v. Italy (no. 1) (no. 40877/98, ECHR 2003-I) and Tsalkitzis v. Greece (no. 11801/04, 16 November 2006).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 73936/01

  DE JORIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 24895/07

  The Court has already acknowledged that it is a long-standing practice for States generally to confer varying degrees of immunity on parliamentarians, with the aim of allowing free speech for representatives of the people and preventing partisan complaints from interfering with parliamentary functions (see A. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, §§ 75-77; Cordova, cited above, § 55, and De Jorio v. Italy, no. 73936/01, § 49, 3 June 2004).
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 29787/03

  RIAD ET IDIAB c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 24895/07

  When a remedy has been attempted, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, 1998-VI, § 71, and Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 84, ECHR 2008-...).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 24895/07

  It would not be consistent with the rule of law in a democratic society, or with the basic principle underlying Article 6 § 1, if a State could, without restraint or control by the Court, remove from the jurisdiction of the courts a whole range of civil claims or confer immunities on categories of persons (see Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no. 294-B).

• EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 16974/14

  KACZMAREK v. POLAND

  In any event, the Court reiterates that when a remedy has been attempted, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see, among other authorities, Moreira Barbosa v. Portugal (dec.), no. 65681/01, ECHR 2004-V (extracts), and Syngelidis v. Greece, no. 24895/07, § 32, 11 February 2010).
• EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 42895/14

  ADILOVSKA v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Furthermore, the Court reiterates that when a remedy has been attempted, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see, among others, Moreira Barbosa v. Portugal (dec.), no. 65681/01, ECHR 2004-V (extracts) and Syngelidis v. Greece, no. 24895/07, § 32, 11 February 2010).
• EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 24779/08

  ANAGNOSTOU-DEDOULI c. GRECE

  A cet égard, la présente affaire se distingue tant de l'arrêt Tsalkitzis c. Grèce précité, qui concernait le refus du Parlement d'autoriser l'ouverture de poursuites pénales, contre un député, pour diverses infractions pénales, que de l'arrêt Syngelidis c. Grèce (no 24895/07, 11 février 2010), qui avait trait aux poursuites pénales engagées par le requérant contre son ex-épouse, députée au Parlement, pour non respect d'une décision de justice relative au droit de visite concernant leur fils.