Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 25091/07   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2011,56167
EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 25091/07 (https://dejure.org/2011,56167)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.04.2011 - 25091/07 (https://dejure.org/2011,56167)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. April 2011 - 25091/07 (https://dejure.org/2011,56167)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56167) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ENUKIDZE AND GIRGVLIANI v. GEORGIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) No violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 38 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (26)

  • EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

    ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Relying on Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 274, 26 April 2011, the applicant submitted that the need to secure public confidence by ensuring accountability was particularly fundamental where a fatal shooting by a police officer was concerned and that confidence would be undermined by a perceived failure to prosecute public officials who were alleged to have violated Article 2 of the Convention.
  • EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11

    NIZOMKHON DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA

    The Court reiterates that Article 38 commands the respondent State to submit the requested material in its entirety, if the Court so requests, and properly to account for any missing elements (see Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 299-300, 26 April, and Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, § 167 et seq., 1 July 2010).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 77938/11

    DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    This is essential for maintaining public confidence and ensuring adherence to the rule of law and for preventing any appearance of tolerance of or collusion in unlawful acts (see Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 96, ECHR 2004-XII; Türkmen v. Turkey, no. 43124/98, § 51, 19 December 2006; Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 57 (e), 20 December 2007; Mojsiejew v. Poland, no. 11818/02, § 53 (d), 24 March 2009; and Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 242, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 15086/07

    Mord an Journalistin: Russland wegen Politkowskaja-Ermittlungen verurteilt

    In our opinion there were no concrete pieces of evidence in the present case that could have led the investigation in the direction of any person in particular, nor were there any identifiable potential witnesses who, if interviewed, could have shed light on the identities of those who had commissioned the killing (see, by contrast, Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 254 and 261, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 10653/10

    HUSEYNOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

    In that connection, the Court cannot accept the investigating authorities" reliance on the domestic law for justifying that situation and finds it unacceptable that under the relevant domestic law the applicant had no access whatsoever to the relevant case materials during the investigation (see Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 250, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 2319/14

    KITANOVSKA STANOJKOVIC AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

    Having regard to the finding relating to Article 2, the Court considers that, whilst the complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 2 is admissible, there is no need for a separate examination of this complaint (see, mutatis mutandis, Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 311, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 72508/13

    MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA

    That new criminal case related to the role of the applicant, in his capacity as Minister of the Interior, in the cover-up of a homicide case which had implicated a number of his close associates, high-ranking officers of the same Ministry, as well as his wife, back in 2006 (see Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 15 and onwards, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08

    BASENKO v. UKRAINE

    36146/05 and 42418/05, § 31, 12 January 2012; Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 289 and 290, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 1413/05

    DAMIR SIBGATULLIN v. RUSSIA

    Noting that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, as that provision stood at the material time, was applied at the time of communication of the present application (see paragraph 4 above), the Court considers that in the absence of a separate decision on admissibility it retained jurisdiction under Article 38 of the Convention, as it read at the material time, to examine the relevant events which took place during the subsequent proceedings (see Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 295, 26 April 2011).
  • EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 15980/12

    MASLOVA c. RUSSIE

    Quand un individu a perdu la vie aux mains d'un agent de l'État dans des circonstances suspectes, les autorités internes compétentes doivent soumettre l'enquête menée sur les faits à un contrôle particulièrement strict (Armani Da Silva c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 5878/08, § 234, 30 mars 2016, et Enoukidze et Guirgvliani c. Géorgie, no 25091/07, § 277, 26 avril 2011).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 47354/07

    UMAYEVY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 1227/06

    GAVRYLOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 25114/11

    NINA KUTSENKO v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 5821/10

    GERASIMENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 22412/08

    EMARS v. LATVIA

  • EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 20875/07

    PASHOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 12.01.2012 - 36146/05

    GOROVENKY AND BUGARA v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 60333/13

    NESKOSKA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 7837/10

    GAVRILOV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  • EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 74282/11

    KHODYUKEVICH c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 11323/08

    SURMANIDZE AND ARTMELADZE v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 2228/10

    GAMTSEMLIDZE v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR - 17247/13 (anhängig)

    MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. HUNGARY AND AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR - 30464/13 (anhängig)

    AKHALAIA v. GEORGIA and 1 other application

  • EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 5168/06

    BAGHASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 4728/08

    KIZIRIA v. GEORGIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht