Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LESJAK v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
• EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 25904/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 11.01.2001 - 38460/97

  PLATAKOU v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06

  The Court cannot accept that the procedure followed by the Administrative Court should be so rigidly formal (see, mutatis mutandis, Platakou v. Greece, no. 38460/97, § 43, ECHR 2001-I).
• EGMR, 28.02.2008 - 37878/02

  TSERKVA SELA SOSULIVKA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06

  In the Court's view, that situation amounts to a denial of justice which impaired the very essence of the applicant's right of access to a court as secured by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Beneficio Cappella Paolini v. San Marino, no. 40786/98, § 29, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts), and Tserkva Sela Sosulivka v. Ukraine, no. 37878/02, § 40, 28 February 2008).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 23805/94

  BELLET c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06

  For the right of access to be effective, an individual must have a clear, practical opportunity to challenge an act interfering with his or her rights (see, for example, Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, § 36, Series A no. 333-B).

 
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06

  The right of access, namely the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect of this "right to a court" (see, notably, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 28-36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06

  However, having regard to its above findings under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 14 thereof (see, among other authorities, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 30, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06

  However, these limitations must not restrict or reduce the access left to an individual in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see, for example, Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93).