Weitere Entscheidung unten: EKMR, 05.03.1996

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,30402
EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95 (https://dejure.org/2001,30402)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.04.2001 - 26129/95 (https://dejure.org/2001,30402)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. April 2001 - 26129/95 (https://dejure.org/2001,30402)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,30402) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TANLI c. TURQUIE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 2 concernant la mort Violation de l'art. 2 concernant l'enquête Non-violation de l'art. 3 Non-violation de l'art. 5 Violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 14 Non-violation de l'art. 18 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TANLI v. TURKEY

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the death Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the investigation No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (60)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    To the extent that it is alleged that the failings in the post mortem examination prevented any concrete evidence of ill-treatment coming to light and thereby the identification and punishment of those responsible, the Court considers that the complaint falls to be considered in this case under Article 13 of the Convention (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey, [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII, §§ 89-93).

    To the extent that it is alleged that the failings in the post mortem examination prevented any concrete evidence of ill-treatment coming to light and thereby the identification and punishment of those responsible, the Court considers that the complaint falls to be considered in this case under Article 13 of the Convention (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey, [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII, §§ 89-93).

  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74

    SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    The question to be decided in such cases is the level of just satisfaction, in respect of either past and future pecuniary loss, which it is necessary to award to an applicant, the matter to be determined by the Court at its discretion, having regard to what is equitable (Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom judgment (former Article 50) of 6 November 1989, Series A no. 38, p. 9, § 15; Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom (just satisfaction), nos.
  • EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

    BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    As regards the applicant's claims for loss of earnings, the Court's case-law establishes that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, amongst other authorities, the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 13 June 1994 (Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, pp.
     
  • EGMR, 27.09.1999 - 32377/96
    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    31417/96 and 32377/96 [Section 3] [25.7.00], ECHR 2000, §§ 22-23).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    The applicant's complaints in this regard are therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see the Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52, and the Kaya and Yasa judgments cited above, § 107, and p. 2442, § 113, respectively).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    It was found in the Salman case (Salman v. Turkey, no. 21986/93 [GC], § 16, ECHR 2000-VII), which also concerned the death of a detainee in police custody, that no documentary records existed to record the movements of detainees from their cells, for example, noting times of interrogations.
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147).
  • EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

    RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    Where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, however, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, the Ribitsch v. Austria judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32).
  • EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

    KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95
    Where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see the Klaas v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 29).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98

    NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

    The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among others, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 68; Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III; and Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 26, ECHR 2004-VII).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02

    Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua

    The Court is not concerned with reaching any findings as to guilt or innocence in that sense (see Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III, and Avsar, cited above, § 284).
  • EGMR, 21.10.2013 - 55508/07

    Massaker von Katyn

    The Court adopted a restrictive approach in situations where the person was taken into custody but later found dead following a relatively short period of uncertainty as to his fate (see Tanlı v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 159, ECHR 2001-III, and Bitiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 36156/04, § 106, 23 April 2009).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 26129/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1996,28456
EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 26129/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,28456)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 05.03.1996 - 26129/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,28456)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 05. März 1996 - 26129/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,28456)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,28456) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EKMR, 11.05.1989 - 14116/88

    SARGIN ; YAGCI contre la TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 26129/95
    It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, para. 36, and Nos. 14116/88 and 14117/88, Sargin and Yagci v. Turkey, Dec. 11.05.89, D.R. 61 p. 250, 262).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

    DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 26129/95
    It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, para. 36, and Nos. 14116/88 and 14117/88, Sargin and Yagci v. Turkey, Dec. 11.05.89, D.R. 61 p. 250, 262).
  • EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19092/91

    YAGIZ c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 26129/95
    The Commission finds that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the criminal proceedings before the Airi Assize Court (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yaiiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R.75 p. 207).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht