Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04, 6329/04, 26300/08, 56557/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.01.2018 - 3634/04, 6329/04, 26300/08, 56557/10 (https://dejure.org/2018,2009)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. Januar 2018 - 3634/04, 6329/04, 26300/08, 56557/10 (https://dejure.org/2018,2009)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,2009) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GAVRIS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 57265/08
DUMITRU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04
3634/04, 56557/10 and 26300/08, as regards the judgments concerning financial orders, the applicants have lost their victim status since the judgments have been duly enforced and within a reasonable time (see, among many other authorities, Kravtsov v. Russia, no. 39272/04, § 24, 5 April 2011, and Dumitru and others v. Romania (dec.), no. 57265/08, §§ 50-51, 4 September 2012). - EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05
KOROLEV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04
Finally, in application no. 56557/10, concerning the failure to enforce the award of 584 Romanian lei (ROL) representing court fees, considering the rather minor amount of the award (roughly equal to 140 euros (EUR)), the Court finds that the applicant did not suffer a significant disadvantage as a result of the authorities" failure to enforce the impugned award (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010, and Vasilchenko v. Russia, no. 34784/02, §§ 49-50, 23 September 2010). - EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 34784/02
VASILCHENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04
Finally, in application no. 56557/10, concerning the failure to enforce the award of 584 Romanian lei (ROL) representing court fees, considering the rather minor amount of the award (roughly equal to 140 euros (EUR)), the Court finds that the applicant did not suffer a significant disadvantage as a result of the authorities" failure to enforce the impugned award (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010, and Vasilchenko v. Russia, no. 34784/02, §§ 49-50, 23 September 2010). - EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 39272/04
KRAVTSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04
3634/04, 56557/10 and 26300/08, as regards the judgments concerning financial orders, the applicants have lost their victim status since the judgments have been duly enforced and within a reasonable time (see, among many other authorities, Kravtsov v. Russia, no. 39272/04, § 24, 5 April 2011, and Dumitru and others v. Romania (dec.), no. 57265/08, §§ 50-51, 4 September 2012). - EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 32141/04
KOSMIDIS ET KOSMIDOU c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04
In application no. 6329/04, the obligation incumbent on the State authorities to demolish a garage was not enforced as the applicant opposed the demolition, thus contributing substantially to the non-enforcement (see, mutatis mutandis, Kosmidis and Kosmidou v. Greece, no. 32141/04 § 27, 8 November 2007).