Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,26813) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
W.R. v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
- EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
29-32, §§ 87-95; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. - EGMR, 30.11.1987 - 8950/80
H. v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
The Court finds that the applicant's right to practice as a lawyer is a "civil right" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (De Moor v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 16, § 47, with reference to the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 32-34, §§ 44-48). - EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 16997/90
DE MOOR c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
The Court finds that the applicant's right to practice as a lawyer is a "civil right" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (De Moor v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 16, § 47, with reference to the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127-B, pp. 32-34, §§ 44-48). - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
14-16, §§ 25-29; Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, p. 13, § 27). - EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
Further, the Court recalls that it has constantly held that disciplinary proceedings in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to "contestations" (disputes) over civil rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (Philis v. Greece (no. 2) judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1085, § 45, with references to the following judgments: König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp.
- EGMR, 09.01.2024 - 56064/16
AKTAY v. TÜRKIYE
The Court notes that the right to practise as a lawyer is a "civil right" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, W.R. v. Austria, no. 26602/95, § 27, 21 December 1999, and Angerjärv and Greinoman, cited above, § 97).
Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,29168) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
- EGMR, 21.12.1999 - 26602/95
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EKMR, 15.04.1997 - 30339/96
BOSSI v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
2 (Art. 10-2) of the Convention (cf. No. 30549/96, Meister v. Germany, Dec. 10.4.97 and No. 30339/96, Bossi v. Germany, Dec. 15.4.97, both unpublished). - EKMR, 10.04.1997 - 30549/96
MEISTER v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
2 (Art. 10-2) of the Convention (cf. No. 30549/96, Meister v. Germany, Dec. 10.4.97 and No. 30339/96, Bossi v. Germany, Dec. 15.4.97, both unpublished). - EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79
Barthold ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
When assessing whether the interference complained of falls within the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the Contracting States, the Convention organs have to determine whether it was "proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued" and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are "relevant and sufficient" (Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; Barthold v. Germany judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 24-25, para. 55). - EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88
OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 26602/95
When assessing whether the interference complained of falls within the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the Contracting States, the Convention organs have to determine whether it was "proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued" and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are "relevant and sufficient" (Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; Barthold v. Germany judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 24-25, para. 55).