Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HEIDEGGER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82

  BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  However, the Court is not entitled to decide on the alleged violation of Article 6 in respect of the Assize Court's failure to obtain additional exonerating evidence as the applicant, assisted by counsel had not asked the court to obtain such evidence (see the Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 88).

  It does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (see the Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89, and the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33).

• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  It does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (see the Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89, and the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  The Court recalls that Article 6 § 3 of the Convention might be of relevance even in the pre-trial stage, if the fairness of the proceedings is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure comply with requirements enshrined in this paragraph (see the Imbroscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13 § 36).

 
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  The Court recalls that Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair trial, it does, however, not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is therefore primarily a matter of national law (see the Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 46).
• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

  KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  The competent national authorities are required under Article 6 § 3 (c) to intervene only if the failings of a lawyer are manifest or are sufficiently brought to their attention in some other way (see the Kamasinski v. Austria judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, p. 33, § 65, and the Daud v. Portugal judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 750, § 38).
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  The Court's task is to ascertain whether the applicant's trial as a whole was fair (see the Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, § 43).
• EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80

  UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 27077/95

  It seems, in the Court's view, appropriate to look at the applicant's complaints about the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings from the point of view of paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 6 taken together, especially as the guarantees of paragraph 3 represent aspects of the concept of a fair trial contained in paragraph 1 (see the Unterpertinger v. Austria judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, § 29).

• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 74613/01

  Rechtssache J. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Aufgabe des Gerichtshofs ist es jedoch zu prüfen, ob der Grundsatz der Waffengleichheit durch die Beweisaufnahme und Beweiswürdigung verletzt worden ist und das Verfahren daher als Ganzes unfair war (…siehe u. a. Vidal ./. Belgien , Urteil vom 22. April 1992, Serie A Band 235, S. 32-33, Rdnr. 33; und Heidegger ./. Österreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 27077/95, 5. Oktober 1999).