Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,3803
EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06 (https://dejure.org/2014,3803)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.03.2014 - 27455/06 (https://dejure.org/2014,3803)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. März 2014 - 27455/06 (https://dejure.org/2014,3803)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,3803) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    STAROKADOMSKIY v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

    Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Public hearing) Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) ...

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 24.04.2001 - 36337/97

    B. AND P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06
    Thus, it may on occasion be necessary under Article 6 to limit the open and public nature of proceedings for a valid reason (see B. and P. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 36337/97 and 35974/97, § 37, ECHR 2001-III, with further references).
  • EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

    Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06
    Although the State cannot be held responsible for every shortcoming on the part of a legal-aid lawyer and, even less, of a privately-retained lawyer (see Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 96, ECHR 2006-...), that does not absolve the State from the duty to organise its legal system in such a way that its courts can meet the obligation to hear cases within a reasonable time (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 129, 8 June 2006).
  • EKMR, 22.10.1998 - 35580/97

    ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06
    Nor does the fact that witnesses, other participants in the trial and potential spectators would have had to undergo identity or security checks in itself deprive the hearing of its public nature (see Riepan v. Austria, no. 35115/97, § 28, ECHR 2000-XII, referring to Allen v. the United Kingdom, no. 35580/97, Commission decision of 22 October 1998, unreported).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

    CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06
    There is a high expectation of publicity in criminal proceedings (see Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, § 87, Series A no. 80).
  • EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77

    PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06
    By rendering the administration of justice transparent, publicity contributes to fulfilling the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial (see Gautrin and Others v. France, 20 May 1998, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, and Pretto and Others v. Italy, 8 December 1983, § 21, Series A no. 71).
  • EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

    AIREY v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 27455/06
    The Court reiterates in this connection that hindrance in fact can contravene the Convention just like a legal impediment (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 25, Series A no. 32).
  • EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 27236/05

    YEVDOKIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    In such cases, the State is under an obligation to take compensatory measures to ensure that the public and the media are duly informed about the place of the hearing and are granted effective access (see Starokadomskiy v. Russia (no. 2), no. 27455/06, §§ 55-63, 13 March 2014, and Riepan v. Austria, no. 35115/97, § 30, ECHR 2000-XII).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 25697/13

    ZAUSHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    However, the amount of compensation appears to be substantially lower than what the Court generally awards in cases featuring complaints about unlawful detention (see, for recent examples, Pletmentsev v. Russia, no. 4157/04, 27 June 2013; Sergey Chebotarev v. Russia, no. 61510/09, 7 May 2014; Starokadomskiy v. Russia (no. 2), no. 27455/06, 13 March 2014; Eduard Shabalin v. Russia, no. 1937/05, 16 October 2014).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht