Weitere Entscheidung unten: EKMR, 25.11.1996

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.01.2004 - 27699/95   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2004,35622
EGMR, 15.01.2004 - 27699/95 (https://dejure.org/2004,35622)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.01.2004 - 27699/95 (https://dejure.org/2004,35622)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Januar 2004 - 27699/95 (https://dejure.org/2004,35622)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,35622) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TEKDAG v. TURKEY

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 34, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
    No violation of Art. 2 as regards alleged abduction and killing Violation of Art. 2 with ragard to lack of an effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 Failure to fulfil obligations under Art. 38-1-a No violation of Art. 34 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (10)

  • EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

    CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

    Le fait qu'un gouvernement, comme en l'espèce, ne permette pas à la Cour de procéder à l'audition des requérants et à l'établissement des faits sans donner à cela de justification satisfaisante, peut altérer le respect par un Etat défendeur des obligations qui lui incombent au titre des articles 34 et 38 § 1 a) de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, Ä°pek c. Turquie, no 25760/94, § 112, CEDH 2004-II ; TekdaÄ? c. Turquie, no 27699/95, § 57, 15 janvier 2004 ; Tahsin Acar, précité, § 254).
  • EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99

    COBZARU v. ROMANIA

    Nevertheless, the remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law; in particular, its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see TekdaÄ? v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, § 95, 15 January 2004).
  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 15256/05

    TCHANKOTADZE v. GEORGIA

    Here are the judgments (in chronological order) in which this pattern has been employed: Selçuk and Asker v. Turkey (24 April 1998, Reports 1998-II) - violations of Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; Kurt v. Turkey (25 May 1998, Reports 1998-III) - violations of Articles 3, 5 and 13, as well as a finding "that the respondent State has failed to comply with its obligations under [former] Article 25 § 1" (as it was worded at that time); Tekin v. Turkey (9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV) - violations of Articles 3 and 13; Ergi v. Turkey (28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV) - violations of Articles 2 and 13 and (former) Article 25 § 1 (as it was worded at that time); Sener v. Turkey (no. 26680/95, 18 July 2000) - violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 10; Tanli v. Turkey (no. 26129/95, ECHR 2001-III) - violations of Articles 2 (both substantive and procedural) and 13; Tepe v. Turkey (no. 27244/95, 9 May 2003) - violations of Articles 2 (procedural) and 13; Yöyler v. Turkey (no. 26973/95, 24 July 2003) - violation of Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; Tekdag v. Turkey (no. 27699/95, 15 January 2004) - violations of Article 2 (procedural) and 13, as well as a finding that the respondent Government had "failed to fulfil their obligation under Article 38 § 1 (a) of the Convention"; Ipek v. Turkey (no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-II) - violations of Articles 2 (both substantive and procedural), 3, 5 and 13 (the latter in conjunction with Articles 2, 3 and 5) of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as well as a finding that the respondent Government had "failed to fulfil their obligation under Article 38 § 1 (a) of the Convention"; Altun v. Turkey (no. 24561/94, 1 June 2004) - violations of Articles 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; Sirin Yilmaz v. Turkey (no. 35875/97, 29 July 2004) - violations of Article 2 (procedural) and 13; Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey (no. 32446/96, 2 November 2004) - violations of Article 3, Article 5 §§ 3, 4 and 5 and Article 13; Dicle v. Turkey (no. 34685/97, 10 November 2004) - violations of Article 10 and Article 6 § 1; Mentese and Others v. Turkey (no. 36217/97, 18 January 2005) - violations of Articles 2 (procedural) and 13; Agtas and Others v. Turkey (no. 33240/96, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 13; Artun and Others v. Turkey (no. 33239/96, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 13; Keser and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33238/96 and 32965/96, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 13; Kumru Yilmaz and Others v. Turkey (no. 36211/97, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 13; Nesibe Haran v. Turkey (no. 28299/95, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 2 (procedural); Öztoprak and Others v. Turkey (no. 33247/96, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 13; Sayli v. Turkey (no. 33243/96, 2 February 2006) - a violation of Article 13; Aksakal v. Turkey (no. 37850/97, §§ 43-44, 15 February 2007) - a violation of Article 13; Khodorkovskiy (cited above) - violations of Article 3 and Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4; OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos (cited above) - violations of Articles 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; and Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev (cited above) - violations of Article 3, Article 5 §§ 3 and 4, Article 6 § 1 (in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) and (d)) and Article 8 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as well as a finding that the authorities had failed "to respect their obligation under Article 34 of the Convention".
  • EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97

    ADALI v. TURKEY

    In the light of its established case-law in similar cases (see Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 212, 9 May 2003; TekdaÄ? v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, § 117, 15 January 2004; and Djavit An, cited above, § 84) and having regard to the circumstances of the case, the Court awards EUR 20, 000 plus any tax that may be chargeable, such sum to be converted into Turkish liras (TRL) at the rate applicable at the date of settlement and paid into the applicant's bank account.
  • EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05

    TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    En se référant à l'affaire TekdaÄ? c. Turquie (no 27699/95, 15 janvier 2004), le Gouvernement indique que l'obligation positive découlant de l'article 2 de la Convention n'impose pas nécessairement à l'Etat de localiser et de poursuivre les auteurs d'attaques mortelles.
  • EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99

    CARABULEA v. ROMANIA

    For the reasons set out above (see paragraphs 132-138 above) no effective criminal investigation can be considered to have been carried out in accordance with Article 13 (see mutatis mutandis, Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, § 105, 20 April 2004; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey, cited above, § 119, and TekdaÄ?, no. 27699/95, § 98, 15 January 2004).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 42344/07

    PREDICA v. ROMANIA

    For the reasons stated above (see paragraphs 69-73 above), no effective or thorough criminal investigation can be considered to have been carried out in the seven years following the impugned incident, either pursuant to Article 2 of the Convention, or even less so in accordance with Article 13, the requirements of which are broader than the obligation to investigate imposed by Article 2 (see mutatis mutandis, Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, § 105, 20 April 2004, and TekdaÄ?, no. 27699/95, § 98, 15 January 2005).
  • EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 48804/99

    OSMANOGLU c. TURQUIE

    That positive obligation, however, does not impose a requirement that a State must necessarily succeed in locating and prosecuting perpetrators of fatal attacks (see TekdaÄ? v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, § 79, 15 January 2004).
  • EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 50388/06

    ELINÇ c. TURQUIE

    Citant l'affaire TekdaÄ? c. Turquie (no 27699/95, 15 janvier 2004), il affirme que l'obligation positive découlant de l'article 2 de la Convention n'impose pas qu'un État doit nécessairement réussir à localiser et à poursuivre des auteurs d'attaques fatales.
  • EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 56154/00

    YILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Nevertheless, the remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see TekdaÄ? v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, § 95, 15 January 2004).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.

Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 25.11.1996 - 27699/95   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/1996,28625
EKMR, 25.11.1996 - 27699/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,28625)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 25.11.1996 - 27699/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,28625)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 25. November 1996 - 27699/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,28625)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,28625) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht