Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SULJAGIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 34, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (victim) Violation of P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 27912/02
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02
• EGMR - 27912/02

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...).
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99

  E.G. c. POLOGNE ET 175 AUTRES AFFAIRES DE LA RIVIÈRE BOUG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  Indeed, the Court's task as defined by Article 19, that is, to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in large series of cases (see, by analogy, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, ECHR 2008-...).

 
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 07.01.2003 - 44912/98

  KOPECKÝ v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  Claims, provided that they have a sufficient basis in domestic law, qualify as an "asset" and can thus be regarded as "possessions" within the meaning of this provision (see Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 52, ECHR 2004-IX).
• EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99

  WOLKENBERG AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  The object of the pilot-judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007-XIV).
• EGMR, 03.10.2008 - 44574/98

  Kovacic u. a. ./. Slowenien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  It should be underlined, however, that such redepositing was as a rule only a paper transaction, because commercial banks had insufficient liquid funds: it would appear that commercial banks redeposited in total 12.2 billion United States dollars (USD), out of which only USD 1.7 billion (approximately 14%) was actually transferred to the National Bank of Yugoslavia (see Kovacic and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574/98, 45133/98 and 48316/99, §§ 36 and 39, ECHR 2008-...; see also decision AP 164/04 of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina of 1 April 2006, § 53).
• EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 53320/99

  TRAJKOVSKI c. " L'EX-REPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACEDOINE "

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 27912/02

  In such circumstances, the present case falls to be examined under the third rule of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see also Trajkovski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV).