Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEWART-BRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEWART-BRADY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

  POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27436/95

  The Commission recalls that the guarantees of Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention apply only to a grievance which can be regarded as "arguable" (see Eur. Court HR, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 14, para. 31).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27436/95

  However in the Airey case (Eur. Court HR, Airey v. Ireland judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32 p. 12, para. 24), the Court decided that the right of access to court guaranteed by Article 6 para.
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27436/95

  The Commission recalls that access to court may be subject to limitations (See Eur. Court HR, Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 24, para. 57).
• EKMR, 10.07.1980 - 8158/78

  X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27436/95

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (see X v. the United Kingdom, No. 8158/78, Dec. 10.7.80, D.R. 21, p. 95 at p. 101, para. 16).

• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Ils n'ont dans aucun de ces cas constaté de violation de l'article 6 § 1 (Winer, décision précitée ; Munro c. Royaume-Uni, no 10594/83, décision de la Commission du 14 juillet 1987, DR 52, p. 158 ; H.S. et D.M. c. Royaume-Uni, no 21325/93, décision de la Commission du 5 mai 1993, non publiée ; Stewart-Brady c. Royaume-Uni, nos 27436/95 et 28406/95, décision de la Commission du 2 juillet 1997, DR 90-B, p. 45 ; McVicar c. Royaume-Uni, no 46311/99, CEDH 2002-III ; et A. c. Royaume-Uni, no 35373/97, CEDH 2002-X).
• EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01

  STEEL AND MORRIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Convention organs had considered the non-availability of legal aid in defamation cases under English law in six cases, and had never found it to breach Article 6 § 1 (see the Winer case, cited above; Munro v. the United Kingdom, no. 10594/83, Commission decision of 14 July 1987; H.S. and D.M. v. the United Kingdom, no. 21325/93, Commission decision of 5 May 1993; Stewart-Brady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 27436/95 and 28406/95, Commission decision of 2 July 1997; McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, ECHR 2002; A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373/97, ECHR 2002).
• EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 38773/05

  SAVITSKYY v. UKRAINE

  27436/95 and 28406/95, 2 July 1997).