Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 28537/02, 2507/03, 16277/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SARL \
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CASES OF \
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 28537/02
- EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 28537/02, 2507/03, 16277/07
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 28537/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
\
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 4, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 28537/02
- EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 28537/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.07.2002 - 48553/99
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 28537/02
The applicant company's complaint under Article 1 of this Protocol, as far as it concerns the period before 7 June 2002, is therefore outside of the Court's juridiction ratione temporis (see, among other authorities, Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553/99, § 56, CEDH 2002-VII).Consequently, the Court considers that the applicant company should be compensated for these financial repercussions by way of an award of non-pecuniary damage (cf. Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine (just satisfaction), no. 48553/99, §§ 78-80, 2 October 2003; Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 32-36, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93
NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 28537/02
According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, among many other authorities, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 28537/02
Consequently, the Court considers that the applicant company should be compensated for these financial repercussions by way of an award of non-pecuniary damage (cf. Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine (just satisfaction), no. 48553/99, §§ 78-80, 2 October 2003; Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 32-36, ECHR 2000-IV).