Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BUSCEMI c. ITALIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Non-violation de l'Art. 8 Violation de l'Art. 6-1 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BUSCEMI v. ITALY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 29569/95
• EGMR, 16.09.1999 - 29569/95

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94

  Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1999 - 29569/95

  I consider such "non-redress" to be inadequate irrespective of the court of justice concerned and, furthermore, to be incompatible with the terms of the Convention, as I explained in detail in my partly dissenting opinion annexed to Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, ECHR 1999-III.
• EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90

  McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.1999 - 29569/95

  The Court has also acknowledged that whilst "Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, the decision-making process leading to measures of interference must be fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded by Article 8" (see the McMichael v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B, p. 55, § 87).

• EuG, 12.12.2018 - T-691/14

  Servier u.a. / Kommission

  Als Zweites führen die Klägerinnen das Urteil des EGMR vom 16. September 1999, Buscemi/Italien (CE:ECHR:1999:0916JUD002956995), an, in dem der EGMR eine Verletzung von Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK und des Rechts jeder Person darauf, dass ihre Sache von einem unparteiischen und unabhängigen Gericht in einem fairen Verfahren gehört wird, festgestellt hat, weil der Vorsitzende des Gerichts öffentlich Ausdrücke, die eine negative Beurteilung der Sache des Klägers nahelegten, verwendet hat, bevor er den Vorsitz des zur Entscheidung dieser Rechtssache berufenen Gerichts geführt hat (§§ 68 und 69).
• EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 14902/04

  Michail Borissowitsch Chodorkowski

  Contribution by an applicant to the length of the proceedings is normally taken into consideration by the Court (see Stork v. Germany, no. 38033/02, § 43, 13 July 2006; Peryt v. Poland, no. 42042/98, § 63, 2 December 2003; and Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 22330/05

  OLUJIC v. CROATIA

  It is the higher demands of justice and the elevated nature of judicial office which impose that duty (see Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VI).

  The statements made by the President of the NJC were such as to objectively justify the applicant's fears as to his impartiality (see Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 68, ECHR 1999-VI).

 
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 51111/07

  Prozess gegen Kreml-Kritiker Chodorkowski war "unfair"

  In terms of the objective test, the conduct of the judges in a given case may be sufficient to ground legitimate and objectively justified apprehensions (as in Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VI), but it may also be of such a nature as to raise an issue under the subjective test (see, for example, Lavents, cited above) and even disclose personal bias.
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.02.2016 - C-614/14

  Ognyanov - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Art. 267 AEUV - Art. 94 der …

  41 - EGMR, Buscemi/Italien, Nr. 29569/95, § 67 und 68, EGMR 1999-VI.
• EGMR, 19.09.2000 - 40031/98

  GNAHORE c. FRANCE

  1001-1002, § 52 ; Bronda c. Italie du 9 juin 1998, Recueil 1998-IV, p. 1489, § 51, et Buscemi c. Italie, no 29569/95, § 53, CEDH 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 36661/07

  CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND

  It is the higher demands of justice and the elevated nature of judicial office which impose that duty (see Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VI, and Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, § 59, 5 February 2009).
• EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 53470/99

  MEHEMI c. FRANCE (N° 2)

  1001-1002, § 52, Bronda c. Italie, arrêt du 9 juin 1998, Recueil 1998-IV, p. 1489, § 51, et Buscemi c. Italie, no 29569/95, § 53, CEDH 1999-VI) et des mesures internes qui empêchent la vie commune constituent une ingérence dans le droit protégé par l'article 8 (voir, entre autres, W. c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 8 juillet 1987, série A no 121, p. 27, § 59).
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 4184/15

  OTEGI MONDRAGON AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

  The statements made by the presiding judge, her subsequent behaviour, as well as the following annulment of the judgment were such as to objectively justify the first applicant's fears as to her impartiality (see Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 79-92, ECHR 2015, Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, § 59, 5 February 2009, Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 68, ECHR 1999-VI; and, mutatis mutandis, Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, §§ 118 and 119, 28 November 2002).
• EGMR, 08.02.2011 - 52531/07

  ZALLI v. ALBANIA

  The applicant submitted that the publication in a law journal in November 2002 of a study by the then President of the Supreme Court on the judicial review of administrative acts, notably presidential decrees, had objectively prejudiced the merits of his case on 30 January 2003 (see Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, ECHR 1999-VI and Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, ECHR 2005-XIII).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 1872/04

  IBRAHIM MOHAMED v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 04.02.2010 - 20953/03

  EWALAKA-KOUMOU v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 1869/04

  SAID BOTAN v. THE NETHERLANDS