Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02, 42973/05, 52643/07, 28653/05, 42434/06, 39441/09, 22741/06, 32520/09, 51099/10, 23750/07, 55408/07, 27763/05, 38281/08, 13421/06, 33134/03, 29772/05, 6888/03, 41704/02, 40131/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CORSACOV AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 18 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CORSACOV CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET 18 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 18944/02
- EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02
- EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02, 42973/05, 52643/07, 28653/05, 42434/06, 39441/09, 22741/06, 32520/09, 51099/10, 23750/07, 55408/07, 27763/05, 38281/08, 13421/06, 33134/03, 29772/05, 6888/03, 41704/02, 40131/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (27)
- KAG Aachen, 07.02.2006 - 30/05
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
30/05/2017. - EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 42434/06
FEODOROV c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
42434/06. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09
STRUC v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
40131/09.
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.02.2005 - 12/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
12/04/2016. - EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 13421/06
MORGOCI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
13421/06. - RG, 30.05.1908 - I 30/08
Förmlichkeiten des Protestes, durch den die Präsentation eines eigenen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
30/08/2017. - EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 55408/07
IPATI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
55408/07. - EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 33134/03
PADURET v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
33134/03. - EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 41704/02
VALERIU AND NICOLAE ROSCA v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
41704/02. - EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09
GASANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
39441/09. - EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 32520/09
GHIMP AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- KAG Mainz, 25.11.2010 - M 29/10
Höhergruppierung
- EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 51099/10
GRECU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EuGH, 23.01.2003 - C-421/00
Sterbenz
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03
VANZHULA v. RUSSIA
- VGH der UEK, 29.03.2005 - 29/01
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 6888/03
PRUNEANU v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 23750/07
IPATE v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 27763/05
LIPENCOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 38281/08
MATASARU AND SAVITCHI v. MOLDOVA
- EuGH, 09.02.2006 - C-23/04
Sfakianakis - Assoziierungsabkommen EWG-Ungarn - Verpflichtung der Zollbehörden, …
- RG, 12.07.1905 - V 23/05
Bergschäden
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
POPA v. MOLDOVA
- LG Koblenz, 11.01.2005 - 2 T 20/05
Vergütung des Berufsbetreuers nach Ablauf der Bestellung
- EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 28653/05
BUZILOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 52643/07
BUZILO v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 42973/05
BISIR AND TULUS v. MOLDOVA
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
POPA v. MOLDOVA
Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account (see, for instance, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX, and Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports 1997-VIII), but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
In such cases the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94
ORHAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
In the absence of such explanation the Court can draw inferences which may be unfavourable for the respondent Government (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 274, 18 June 2002).
- EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05
SARBAN v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
In the context of detainees, the Court has emphasised that persons in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect their physical well-being (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 73, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts); Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 77, 4 October 2005; and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 40, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03
TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
In the context of detainees, the Court has emphasised that persons in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect their physical well-being (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 73, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts); Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 77, 4 October 2005; and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 40, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
The applicant's complaints in this regard were therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 29772/05
Allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see, mutatis mutandis, Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 30, Series A no. 269).
- EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 38963/18
V.I. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
In the absence of more information, the Court notes the difficulty in determining beyond reasonable doubt whether there is any substance to the applicant's allegations of placement in a psychiatric hospital without therapeutic necessity and considers that this difficulty stems from the authorities' failure to investigate his complaints effectively (see Petru Ro?Ÿca v. Moldova, no. 2638/05, § 42, 6 October 2009, and Popa v. Moldova, no. 29772/05, § 39, 21 September 2010). - EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 26815/16
PETRAKOVSKYY AND LEONTYEV v. Ukraine v. UKRAINE
The Court considers that the difficulty in determining the substance of the applicants' allegations of ill-treatment stems from the authorities' failure to investigate their complaints effectively (see, in particular, Popa v. Moldova, no. 29772/05, §§ 39 and 45, 21 September 2010; Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, §§ 109 and 119, 25 June 2013; and Barysheva v. Ukraine, no. 9505/12, § 55, 14 March 2017). - EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02
CORSACOV AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 18 OTHER CASES
29772/05. - EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 45393/04
TIMOFEJEVI v. LATVIA
However, for the reasons set out below, it considers that the difficulty in determining whether there was any substance to the first applicant's allegations of ill-treatment rests with the authorities failure to investigate their complaints effectively (see VeznedaroÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 32357/96, § 31, 11 April 2000; Petru Rosca v. Moldova, no. 2638/05, § 42, 6 October 2009; Popa v. Moldova, no. 29772/05, § 39, 21 September 2010; and Hristovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42697/05, § 83, 11 October 2011).