Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOBELIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 and P1-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 30672/03

  The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case his or her heirs of next kin may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 69306/01

  SHVEDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 30672/03

  Furthermore, in two Russian cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments in the applicant's favour, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, § 8, 13 July 2006; see also Shvedov v. Russia, no. 69306/01, 20 October 2005, where the Court implicitly recognised locus standi of the applicant's son).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 21417/04

  SHIRYAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 30672/03

  Furthermore, in two Russian cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments in the applicant's favour, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, § 8, 13 July 2006; see also Shvedov v. Russia, no. 69306/01, 20 October 2005, where the Court implicitly recognised locus standi of the applicant's son).

• EGMR, 03.10.2008 - 44574/98

  Kovacic u. a. ./. Slowenien

  30672/03 et al., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 45580/15

  TREGUET c. RUSSIE

  La Cour relève que l'adjoint du président a fait état dans sa décision des motifs substantiels et impérieux pouvant justifier à titre exceptionnel la remise en cause de la décision préalablement jugée en degré d'appel (voir, a contrario, Sobelin et autres c. Russie, nos 30672/03 et 11 autres, § 59, 3 mai 2007, concernant l'annulation d'un jugement en révision pour des motifs non précisés, Karen Poghosyan c. Arménie, no 62356/09, § 49, 31 mars 2016, concernant l'admission d'un appel tardif sans motifs et avec une appréciation des faits manifestement déraisonnable, ou Tigrak, précité, où un recours en rectification d'une erreur matérielle a été utilisé pour réexaminer un jugement définitif sur le fond).
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 9117/04

  NOSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Furthermore, in some cases concerning non-enforcement of court judgments, the Court recognised the right of the relatives of the deceased applicant to pursue the application (see Shiryayeva v. Russia, no. 21417/04, §§ 8-9, 13 July 2006; Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et al., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007; and Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 et al., §§ 36-42, 29 July 2010).

 
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 2982/05

  SHURYGINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court has also found in a number of cases relating to claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that applications concerning property rights are, in principle, transferable to heirs (see, among other authorities, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et al., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007, for issues relating to both Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention).
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 53637/08

  ZHITNIKOV AND KOLOSOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has also found in a number of cases relating to claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, that the applications concerning property rights may be, in principle, transferable to the heirs (see, among others, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII; see also Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et seq., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007, concerning a combination of issues under Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No.1).
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 53678/08

  VERIGIN v. RUSSIA

  The Court has also found in a number of cases relating to claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, that the applications concerning property rights may be, in principle, transferable to the heirs (see, among others, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII; see also Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et seq., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007, concerning a combination of issues under Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No.1).
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 53664/08

  MATVIYENKO v. RUSSIA

  The Court has also found in a number of cases relating to claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the applications concerning property rights are, in principle, transferable to the heirs (see, among others, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII; see also Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et seq., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007, concerning a combination of issues under Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
• EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 29612/09

  MARTYNETS v. RUSSIA

  Les dispositions qui régissaient la procédure de révision du 1er février 2003 au 7 janvier 2008 ont été décrites dans de précédents arrêts et décisions de la Cour (voir Denisov c. Russie, no 21823/03, 25 janvier 2007 ; et Sobeline et autres c. Russie, nos 30672/03, 30673/03, 30678/03, 30682/03, 30692/03, 30707/03, 30713/03, 30734/03, 30736/03, 30779/03, 32080/03 et 34952/03, § 34, 3 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 43603/09

  PULYAYEV c. RUSSIE

  La procédure de supervision a donc opéré en l'espèce comme un recours ordinaire (voir Yanakiev c. Bulgarie, no 40476/98, § 65, 10 août 2006), et non pas comme un moyen extraordinaire de révision (voir, a contrario, Riabykh c. Russie, no 52854/99, §§ 54-56, CEDH 2003-IX, Prissiajnikova et Dolgopolov c. Russie, no 24247/04, § 25, 28 septembre 2006, Sobelin et autres c. Russie, nos 30672/03 et al., §§ 56-61, 3 mai 2007, et Koulkov et autres c. Russie, nos 25114/03 et al., § 31, 8 janvier 2009).
• EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 47687/07

  GORANOV v. BULGARIA

  The Court has also found in a number of cases relating to claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the applications concerning property rights are, in principle, transferable to the heirs (see Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et seq., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  ABBASOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 43327/02

  TSAREVA v. RUSSIA