Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABUHMAID v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 13+8 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ABUHMAID v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13
The Court notes that in certain circumstances Article 8 may be read as imposing on States a positive obligation to provide an effective and accessible means of protecting the right to respect for private and/or family life (see Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 162, ECHR 2005-X; Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 33, Series A no. 32; and McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 101, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III). - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 31956/05
HAMIDOVIC c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13
However, domestic decisions in immigration matters may interfere with a right protected under paragraph 1 of Article 8 (see, among others, Hamidovic v. Italy, no. 31956/05, §§ 36-38, 4 December 2012).
- EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 42321/15
SUDITA KEITA v. HUNGARY
Thus, the totality of social ties between a migrant and the community in which he or she lives constitutes part of the concept of private life under Article 8 (see, mutatis mutandis, Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, § 63, ECHR 2008, and Abuhmaid [v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13, § 102, 12 January 2017]).Having regard to the combined effect of the above elements, the Court is not persuaded that, in the particular circumstances of the applicant's case, the respondent State complied with its positive obligation to provide an effective and accessible procedure or a combination of procedures enabling the applicant to have the issue of his status in Hungary determined with due regard to his private-life interests under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Hoti, cited above, § 141; compare and contrast Abuhmaid v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13 § 126, 12 January 2017).
- EGMR, 28.07.2020 - 25402/14
PORMES v. THE NETHERLANDS
On the other hand, positive obligations arise for States in cases concerning, inter alia, the denial of a residence permit to individuals already present in the territory of the respondent State (see, for example, Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, 3 October 2014; B.A.C. v. Greece, no. 11981/15, 13 October 2016; Abuhmaid v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13, 12 January 2017; Ejimson v. Germany, no. 58681/12, 1 March 2018; and Hoti v. Croatia, no. 63311/14, 26 April 2018).