Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,103
EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,103)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.01.2017 - 31183/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,103)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Januar 2017 - 31183/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,103)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,103) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ABUHMAID v. UKRAINE

    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 13+8 - ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

    AIREY v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13
    The Court notes that in certain circumstances Article 8 may be read as imposing on States a positive obligation to provide an effective and accessible means of protecting the right to respect for private and/or family life (see Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 162, ECHR 2005-X; Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 33, Series A no. 32; and McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 101, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 31956/05

    HAMIDOVIC c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 31183/13
    However, domestic decisions in immigration matters may interfere with a right protected under paragraph 1 of Article 8 (see, among others, Hamidovic v. Italy, no. 31956/05, §§ 36-38, 4 December 2012).
  • EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 42321/15

    SUDITA KEITA v. HUNGARY

    Thus, the totality of social ties between a migrant and the community in which he or she lives constitutes part of the concept of private life under Article 8 (see, mutatis mutandis, Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, § 63, ECHR 2008, and Abuhmaid [v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13, § 102, 12 January 2017]).

    Having regard to the combined effect of the above elements, the Court is not persuaded that, in the particular circumstances of the applicant's case, the respondent State complied with its positive obligation to provide an effective and accessible procedure or a combination of procedures enabling the applicant to have the issue of his status in Hungary determined with due regard to his private-life interests under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Hoti, cited above, § 141; compare and contrast Abuhmaid v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13 § 126, 12 January 2017).

  • EGMR, 28.07.2020 - 25402/14

    PORMES v. THE NETHERLANDS

    On the other hand, positive obligations arise for States in cases concerning, inter alia, the denial of a residence permit to individuals already present in the territory of the respondent State (see, for example, Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, 3 October 2014; B.A.C. v. Greece, no. 11981/15, 13 October 2016; Abuhmaid v. Ukraine, no. 31183/13, 12 January 2017; Ejimson v. Germany, no. 58681/12, 1 March 2018; and Hoti v. Croatia, no. 63311/14, 26 April 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht