Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,33039
EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15 (https://dejure.org/2016,33039)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.10.2016 - 31928/15 (https://dejure.org/2016,33039)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Oktober 2016 - 31928/15 (https://dejure.org/2016,33039)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,33039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KONOVALCHUK v. UKRAINE

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 34 ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (36)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    A lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII, and Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 90, 4 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

    SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    A lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII, and Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 90, 4 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 50278/99

    AOULMI c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    According to the Court's established case-law, a respondent State's failure to comply with an interim measure entails a violation of the right of individual application (see Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 125, ECHR 2005-I; Aoulmi v. France, no. 50278/99, § 108, ECHR 2006-I (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

    SIMON v. UKRAINE

    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 5312/20

    RADCHENKO AND ABRAMOV v. UKRAINE

    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references, and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 29857/19

    SHCHURKO AND OTRYSHKO v. UKRAINE

    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht