Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 34006/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,2390) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZYAKUN v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 34006/06
However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 34006/06
Such an investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 3016/16
BOGDAN v. UKRAINE
The Court has already held that confession statements made while in unrecorded detention, combined with evidence of unexplained injuries, may create an appearance that such statements were not voluntary (see, for example, Belousov v. Ukraine, no. 4494/07, § 63, 7 November 2013, and Zyakun v. Ukraine, no. 34006/06, 25 February 2016). - EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 13577/16
STOROZHUK AND KONONOV v. UKRAINE
(iii) Lack of independence of the initial inquiry (case was only transferred from the police to the prosecutor's office in 2012; for relevant examples, see Kirpichenko v. Ukraine, no. 38833/03, § 87, 2 April 2015 and Zyakun v. Ukraine, no. 34006/06, § 44, 25 February 2016). - EGMR - 23906/15 (anhängig)
ODARENKO v. UKRAINE
Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against her, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the fairness of her trial undermined by the admission as evidence of her statements allegedly obtained in breach of her rights under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Zamferesko v. Ukraine, no. 30075/06, §§ 70-72, 15 November 2012; and Zyakun v. Ukraine, no. 34006/06, §§ 62-64, 25 February 2016)?. - EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 47351/06
TYMCHENKO v. UKRAINE
This finding applies irrespective of the probative value of the statements and irrespective of whether their use is decisive in securing the defendant's conviction (see Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010, with further references, and Zyakun v. Ukraine, no. 34006/06, §§ 62-64, 25 February 2016).