Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GEORGI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95

  ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  They must be assessed on the basis of all relevant facts and with regard to the practical realities of investigation work (see Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000-VI, and Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 144, 16 July 2002).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  That obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have died in violent or suspicious circumstances, even if there is no indication that the death is due to State action (see, concerning inter-prisoner violence, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; concerning homicides by prisoners benefiting from early release or social re-integration schemes, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89, 92 and 93, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 123-26, 15 December 2009; concerning racist attacks, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-105, ECHR 2007-IX; concerning high-profile assassinations, Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 191-215, 5 November 2009; concerning domestic violence, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 150 and 151, ECHR 2009-...; concerning motor-car accidents, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010; concerning deadly accidents on construction sites, Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, §§ 12 and 54-63, 9 May 2006; and, concerning suspicious deaths, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 234, 7 January 2010, and Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, § 26, 23 March 2010).
• EGMR, 26.08.2003 - 59493/00

  WITHEY contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  To hold that this in itself poses a problem under the access-to-court provision of Article 6 § 1 would mean to require all criminal investigations to result in trials, which would be inconsistent with the Court's position that the right of access to a court in criminal matters may be limited through a decision not to charge or prosecute, or a decision to discontinue a prosecution (see Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, § 49 in limine, Series A no. 35; Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X; Soini and Others v. Finland, no. 36404/97, §§ 67-69, 17 January 2006; and Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, § 81, 22 May 2008), and with its established case-law that Article 6 § 1 does not guarantee the right to have others prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence (see, among many other authorities, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I).

 
• EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 21387/05

  BANKS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  However, it would emphasise that that obligation may differ, both in content and in terms of its underlying rationale, depending on the particular situation that has triggered it (see Banks and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 21387/05, 6 February 2007, and, mutatis mutandis, Beganovic v. Croatia, no. 46423/06, § 69, ECHR 2009-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38501/02

  AL FAYED c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  That obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have died in violent or suspicious circumstances, even if there is no indication that the death is due to State action (see, concerning inter-prisoner violence, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; concerning homicides by prisoners benefiting from early release or social re-integration schemes, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89, 92 and 93, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 123-26, 15 December 2009; concerning racist attacks, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-105, ECHR 2007-IX; concerning high-profile assassinations, Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 191-215, 5 November 2009; concerning domestic violence, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 150 and 151, ECHR 2009-...; concerning motor-car accidents, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010; concerning deadly accidents on construction sites, Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, §§ 12 and 54-63, 9 May 2006; and, concerning suspicious deaths, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 234, 7 January 2010, and Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, § 26, 23 March 2010).
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 37393/02

  RAJKOWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  That obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have died in violent or suspicious circumstances, even if there is no indication that the death is due to State action (see, concerning inter-prisoner violence, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; concerning homicides by prisoners benefiting from early release or social re-integration schemes, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89, 92 and 93, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 123-26, 15 December 2009; concerning racist attacks, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-105, ECHR 2007-IX; concerning high-profile assassinations, Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 191-215, 5 November 2009; concerning domestic violence, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 150 and 151, ECHR 2009-...; concerning motor-car accidents, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010; concerning deadly accidents on construction sites, Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, §§ 12 and 54-63, 9 May 2006; and, concerning suspicious deaths, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 234, 7 January 2010, and Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, § 26, 23 March 2010).
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 65755/01

  ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  To hold that this in itself poses a problem under the access-to-court provision of Article 6 § 1 would mean to require all criminal investigations to result in trials, which would be inconsistent with the Court's position that the right of access to a court in criminal matters may be limited through a decision not to charge or prosecute, or a decision to discontinue a prosecution (see Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, § 49 in limine, Series A no. 35; Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X; Soini and Others v. Finland, no. 36404/97, §§ 67-69, 17 January 2006; and Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, § 81, 22 May 2008), and with its established case-law that Article 6 § 1 does not guarantee the right to have others prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence (see, among many other authorities, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  That obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have died in violent or suspicious circumstances, even if there is no indication that the death is due to State action (see, concerning inter-prisoner violence, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; concerning homicides by prisoners benefiting from early release or social re-integration schemes, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89, 92 and 93, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 123-26, 15 December 2009; concerning racist attacks, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-105, ECHR 2007-IX; concerning high-profile assassinations, Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 191-215, 5 November 2009; concerning domestic violence, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 150 and 151, ECHR 2009-...; concerning motor-car accidents, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010; concerning deadly accidents on construction sites, Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, §§ 12 and 54-63, 9 May 2006; and, concerning suspicious deaths, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 234, 7 January 2010, and Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, § 26, 23 March 2010).
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 23401/04

  RAILEAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  That obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have died in violent or suspicious circumstances, even if there is no indication that the death is due to State action (see, concerning inter-prisoner violence, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; concerning homicides by prisoners benefiting from early release or social re-integration schemes, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89, 92 and 93, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 123-26, 15 December 2009; concerning racist attacks, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-105, ECHR 2007-IX; concerning high-profile assassinations, Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 191-215, 5 November 2009; concerning domestic violence, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 150 and 151, ECHR 2009-...; concerning motor-car accidents, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010; concerning deadly accidents on construction sites, Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, §§ 12 and 54-63, 9 May 2006; and, concerning suspicious deaths, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 234, 7 January 2010, and Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, § 26, 23 March 2010).
• EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 12219/05

  IORGA v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  That obligation requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have died in violent or suspicious circumstances, even if there is no indication that the death is due to State action (see, concerning inter-prisoner violence, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; concerning homicides by prisoners benefiting from early release or social re-integration schemes, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89, 92 and 93, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 123-26, 15 December 2009; concerning racist attacks, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, §§ 91-105, ECHR 2007-IX; concerning high-profile assassinations, Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 191-215, 5 November 2009; concerning domestic violence, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, §§ 150 and 151, ECHR 2009-...; concerning motor-car accidents, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010; concerning deadly accidents on construction sites, Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, §§ 12 and 54-63, 9 May 2006; and, concerning suspicious deaths, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 234, 7 January 2010, and Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, § 26, 23 March 2010).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

• EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 24340/07

  PETRELLA c. ITALIE

  En particulier, la Cour n'a pas conclu à la violation de l'article 6 de la Convention dans le cas où les poursuites pénales n'avaient pas été menées ou avaient été abandonnées en raison du fait: qu'aucune infraction pénale n'avait été constatée (Georgi Georgiev c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 34137/03, 11 janvier 2011, Assenov et autres, précité, §§ 22-23, Moldovan et autres, précité, §§ 36-37, Forum Maritime S.A., précité, § 30, et Manolea et autres c. Roumanie (déc.), no 58162/14, § 23, 15 septembre 2020), ou que la procédure pénale s'était achevée en application d'un accord de « plaider coupable'(Nikolov c. Bulgarie (V) (déc.), no 39672/03, 28 septembre 2010) ou d'un privilège de juridiction (Ernst et autres, précité, § 49) ou en raison du décès de l'accusé (Manolea et autres, précité, § 23).
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12

  S.Z. c. BULGARIE

  Certes, il ne revient pas, en principe, à la Cour de remettre en question les pistes suivies par les enquêteurs ou les constatations de fait auxquelles ils sont parvenus, sauf dans le cas où si celles-ci sont arbitraires ou ne reposent manifestement pas sur des éléments pertinents (Georgiev c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 34137/03, 11 janvier 2011, voir aussi Nikolay Dimitrov c. Bulgarie, no 72663/01, § 76, 27 septembre 2007).
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 655/16

  LAKATOSOVÁ AND LAKATOS v. SLOVAKIA

  The Court reiterates that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 110, ECHR 2005-VII), even where the presumed perpetrator of the attack is not a State agent (see Georgi Georgiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 34137/03, 11 January 2011 with further references; Fedorchenko and Lozenko v. Ukraine, no. 387/03, § 64, 20 September 2012; and Balázs, cited above, § 51).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 77370/16

  I.I. AND M.S. v. BULGARIA

  But they did so with full reasons, and it does not appear that those reasons were arbitrary or manifestly failed to take into account relevant elements (see paragraphs 27, 37 and 48 above, and, mutatis mutandis, Grams v. Germany (dec.), no. 33677/96, ECHR 1999-VII; Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 81-82, 27 September 2007; and Georgi Georgiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 34137/03, 11 January 2011).