Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHCHERBAKOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 34959/07

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 34959/07

  Where such grounds are "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 and 153, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 34959/07

  Nor can continuation of the detention be used to anticipate a custodial sentence (see Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 51, Series A no. 207; Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, § 102, 8 February 2005; Goral v. Poland, no. 38654/97, § 68, 30 October 2003; and Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, § 81, 26 July 2001).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 34959/07

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the applicant's conduct and the conduct of the competent authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).

• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 2335/09

  TKACHUK c. RUSSIE

  À titre de comparaison, elle rappelle que, dans l'arrêt Shcherbakov c. Russie (no 2) (no 34959/07, § 101, 24 octobre 2013) et l'arrêt Butusov c. Russie (no 7923/04, § 34, 22 décembre 2009), elle a conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention pour des durées respectivement de trente-quatre jours et de vingt jours.
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 27297/07

  KOLOMENSKIY c. RUSSIE

  À titre de comparaison, elle rappelle que, dans les arrêts Shcherbakov c. Russie (no 2) (no 34959/07, § 101, 24 octobre 2013) et Butusov c. Russie (no 7923/04, § 34, 22 décembre 2009), elle a conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention pour des durées de trente-quatre jours et de vingt jours respectivement.
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  CHIRYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia (see, in general, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012; and also, as regards the conditions of detention obtaining in the IZ-71/1 remand prison at the material time, Kozhokar v. Russia, no. 33099/08, §§ 95-98, 16 December 2010, and Shcherbakov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 34959/07, §§ 67-74, 24 October 2013).