Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,42053
EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,42053)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.11.2016 - 35688/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,42053)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. November 2016 - 35688/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,42053)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,42053) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MANUCHARYAN v. ARMENIA

    Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 40476/98

    YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11
    In the case of a violation of Article 6 of the Convention, the applicant should as far as possible be put in the position he would have been in had the requirements of that provision not been disregarded (see, mutatis mutandis, Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 127, ECHR 2006-II, and Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 89, 10 August 2006).
  • EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 55287/10

    SETON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11
    The more important that evidence, the more weight the counterbalancing factors would have to carry in order for the proceedings as a whole to be considered fair (see Seton v. the United Kingdom, no. 55287/10, § 59, 31 March 2016).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 12489/86

    Windisch ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11
    It will therefore consider the applicant's complaint under both provisions taken together (see Windisch v. Austria, 27 September 1990, § 23, Series A no. 186).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

    SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11
    In addition, the Court considers it necessary to point out that a judgment in which it finds a violation of the Convention or its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, if any, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found by the Court and make all feasible reparation for its consequences in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 487, ECHR 2004-VII; and Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710/00, § 55, 26 January 2006).
  • EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 7203/12

    DIMOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

    Neither is there any indication that the national courts were aware that a statement of an absent witness, such as R.K., carried less weight (see, in this regard, Paic v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 43, 29 March 2016; Dimovic, cited above, § 44; and Manucharyan v. Armenia, no. 35688/11, § 58, 24 November 2016).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht