Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,27197
EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05 (https://dejure.org/2012,27197)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.07.2012 - 35972/05 (https://dejure.org/2012,27197)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Juli 2012 - 35972/05 (https://dejure.org/2012,27197)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,27197) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IACOV STANCIU v. ROMANIA

    Art. 3, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (61)Neu Zitiert selbst (24)

  • EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 12934/02

    STOICESCU MARIAN c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    This state of affairs in itself raises an issue under Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Marian Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 12934/02, §§ 13 and 24, 16 July 2009; Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, § 122, ECHR 2009-...; and Mandic and Jovic v. Slovenia, nos.

    The Court has regularly found violations of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the conditions of detention that have existed over a number of years in Romanian prisons, in particular overcrowding, inappropriate hygiene and lack of appropriate health care (see, among many other cases, Bragadireanu, cited above; Petrea v. Romania, no. 4792/03, 29 April 2008; Gagiu v. Romania, no. 63258/00, 24 February 2009; Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, 7 April 2009; Maciuca v. Romania, no. 25673/03, 26 August 2009; Artimenco v. Romania, no. 12535/04, 30 June 2009; Marian Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 12934/02, 16 July 2009; Eugen Gabriel Radu v. Romania, no. 3036/04, 13 October 2009; V.D. v. Romania, no. 7078/02, 16 February 2010; Dimakos v. Romania, no. 10675/03, 6 July 2010; Coman v. Romania, no. 34619/04, 26 October 2010; Dobri v. Romania, no. 25153/04, 14 December 2010; Cucolas v. Romania, no. 17044/03, 26 October 2010; Micu v. Romania, no. 29883/06, 8 February 2011; Fane Ciobanu v. Romania, no. 27240/03, 11 October 2011; and Onaca v. Romania, no. 22661/06, 13 March 2012).

  • EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02

    DRIZA c. ALBANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    However, the Court's concern is to facilitate the rapid and effective suppression of a shortcoming found in the national system of protection of human rights (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-XII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...; Poghossian v. Georgia, no. 9870/07, §§ 67 to 70, 24 February 2009; Ghavtadze v. Georgia, no. 23204/07, §§ 102 to 106, 3 March 2009).
     
  • EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

    Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10

    MANDIC AND JOVIC v. SLOVENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    5774/10 and 5985/10, § 77, 20 October 2011, with further references).
  • EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 25867/03

    IAMANDI c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 22088/04

    BRAGADIREANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 12066/02

    CIORAP v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

    S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...; Poghossian v. Georgia, no. 9870/07, §§ 67 to 70, 24 February 2009; Ghavtadze v. Georgia, no. 23204/07, §§ 102 to 106, 3 March 2009).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

    SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05
    Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 9870/07

    POGHOSSIAN c. GEORGIE

  • EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

    Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  • EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 27250/02

    Menschrechtskonvention: Überlange Verfahrensdauer, Zivilrechtsstreit

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

    BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90

    HURTADO c. SUISSE

  • EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

    NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 67253/01

    BABUSHKIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

    PEERS v. GREECE

  • EGMR, 01.04.2004 - 50357/99

    CAMBERROW MM5 AD v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

    VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  • EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95

    POSTI AND RAHKO v. FINLAND

  • EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 35207/03

    OSTROVAR v. MOLDOVA

  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 03.03.2016 - C-404/15

    Caldararu - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Polizeiliche und justizielle …

    10 - Nr. 35972/05, 24. Juli 2012.
  • OLG Celle, 02.03.2017 - 1 AR (Ausl) 99/16

    Zulässigkeit der Auslieferung zur Strafvollstreckung nach Rumänien aufgrund eines …

    Denn nach den gegenwärtigen europäischen Mindeststandards, wie sie vom Europäischen Komitee zur Verhütung von Folter und unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Strafe des Europarats ("CPT") formuliert worden sind, soll bereits Gefangenen, die nicht in überbelegten Hafträumen untergebracht sind, pro Tag über einen Zeitraum von mindestens acht Stunden Bewegungsfreiheit außerhalb der Haftzellen gewährleistet werden (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 14. Februar 2017 - 14249/07, Lazar/Rumänien , Rn. 44;… EGMR, Urteil der Großen Kammer vom 20. Oktober 2016 - 7334/13, Mur?.ic /Kroatien , Rn. 48; EGMR, Urteil vom 24. Oktober 2012 - 35972/05, Iacov Stanciu/Rumänien , Rn. 121).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

    Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

    When dealing with complaints in relation to conditions of detention that do not simply relate to a specific event, but concern a whole range of problems regarding sanitary conditions, the temperature in the cells, overcrowding, lack of adequate medical treatment and so on, which have affected an inmate throughout his or her incarceration, the Court regards this as a continuing situation, even if the person concerned has been transferred to various detention facilities (see Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, §§ 34-36, 26 June 2008; Sudarkov v. Russia, no. 3130/03, § 40, 10 July 2008; and Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972/05, §§ 136-38, 24 July 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht