Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 25792/94, 20758/03, 37444/97, 3158/06, 40153/09, 38713/06, 18120/03, 46117/07, 22807/07, 20005/04, 23042/02, 3489/03, 17584/04, 49929/99, 33868/05, 55777/08, 30049/06, 15067/02, 75112/01, 36250/06, 34221/96, 62324/00, 6334/02, 75107/01, 5270/04, 35367/05 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TRZASKA AND 172 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TRZASKA ET 172 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 25792/94
- EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 25792/94
- EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 25792/94, 20758/03, 37444/97, 3158/06, 40153/09, 38713/06, 18120/03, 46117/07, 22807/07, 20005/04, 23042/02, 3489/03, 17584/04, 49929/99, 33868/05, 55777/08, 30049/06, 15067/02, 75112/01, 36250/06, 34221/96, 62324/00, 6334/02, 75107/01, 5270/04, 35367/05
Wird zitiert von ... (8)
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
L'obligation que l'article 5 § 3 fait peser sur les Etats contractants se borne donc à la nécessité de conduire rapidement la personne détenue devant un magistrat compétent à ce stade initial, bien que l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention puisse dans certains cas exiger que l'intéressé soit ensuite présenté à un juge pour pouvoir contester de manière effective la régularité de sa détention lorsque celle-ci a une durée excessive (voir, mutatis mutandis, Trzaska c. Pologne, requête no 25792/94, rapport de la Commission du 19 mai 1998, §§ 71-81, non publié). - EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04
BAK v. POLAND
The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities which in this instance call for an overall assessment (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Szeloch v. Poland, no. 33079/96, § 101, 22 February 2001). - EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 45553/06
VOGT c. SUISSE
La Cour rappelle que, dans plusieurs affaires dans lesquelles le requérant était décédé en cours de procédure, elle a pris en compte la volonté de poursuivre celle-ci qu'ont exprimée les héritiers ou parents proches (voir, par exemple, Loukanov c. Bulgarie, 20 mars 1997, § 35, Recueil 1997-II ; Nikolaj Krempovskij c. Lituanie (déc.), no 37193/97, 20 avril 1999 ; Jecius c. Lituanie, no 34578/97, § 41, CEDH 2000-IX ; Pisarkiewicz c. Pologne, no 18967/02, § 31, 22 janvier 2008 ; Todev c. Bulgarie, no 31036/02, § 20, 22 mai 2008, et Gouloub Atanassov c. Bulgarie, no 73281/01, § 42, 6 novembre 2008).
- EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 18480/06
KURATOW c. POLOGNE
Les dispositions du droit interne sur la procédure relative à l'application de la détention préventive sont amplement citées notamment dans l'affaire Trzaska c. Pologne, no 25792/94, du 11 juillet 2000, au §§ 48 et 49. - EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 25413/04
HOLOWCZAK v. POLAND
The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities which in this instance call for an overall assessment (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Szeloch v. Poland, no. 33079/96, § 101, 22 February 2001). - EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 44131/05
KOWALCZYK v. POLAND
In these circumstances, the Court is not persuaded that the instant case presented particular difficulties for the investigation authorities or for the courts to determine the facts and mount a case against the perpetrators, as would undoubtedly have been the case had the proceedings concerned organised crime (see Celejewski v. Poland, cited above, § 37, Kwiatek v. Poland, no. 20204/02, § 46, 6 February 2007 and Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, §§ 56-65, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)). - EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 1629/11
LORBIECKI v. POLAND
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the length of the proceedings by which a person seeks to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (see, for example, Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III; Lewicki v. Poland, no. 28993/05, 6 October 2009; Pyrak v.Poland, no. 54476/00, 12 February 2008; Lorbiecki (dec), cited above). - EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 50178/08
LORBIECKI v. POLAND
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the length of the proceedings by which a persons seeks to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (see, for example, Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III; Lewicki v. Poland, no. 28993/05, 6 October 2009; Pyrak v. Poland, no. 54476/00, 12 February 2008).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 37444/97 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAGINSKI v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-1 Violations of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 37444/97
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 27785/95
WLOCH v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 37444/97
The prosecutor's submissions were put on the record of the session (see also Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, judgment of 19 October 2000, §§ 69-73).In that regard, it would in particular refer to its judgments in the cases of Niedbala v. Poland (cited above §§ 48-57) and Wloch v. Poland (no. 27785/95, §§ 125-132; 19 October 2000, ECHR-2000-XI, p. 35-36; §§ 125-131), in which it has repeated the criteria established in its case-law in respect of the "fundamental guarantees of procedure applied in matters of deprivation of liberty" and has emphasised that one of the essential features of such a procedure is equality of arms between the prosecutor and the detained person.
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 37444/97
Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110-111 with further references, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 58971/00
RADOSLAV POPOV v. BULGARIA
Accordingly, the time-limit for submitting the related complaint to the Court expired six months after 4 May 1999 (see G.K. v. Poland (dec.), no. 38816/97, 8 December 1998; Baginski v. Poland (dec.), no. 37444/97, 21 January 2003; Oratowski v. Poland, (dec.), no. 40698/98, 6 February 2003; Al Akidi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 35825/97, 19 September 2000; and Hristov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 35436/97, 19 September 2000).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 37444/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 27915/95
NIEDBALA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
The Court, having regard to the criteria established in its case-law in respect of a "judge" or "officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power" for the purposes of Article 5 § 3 and, more particularly, to its judgment in the case of Niedbala v. Poland, (no. 27915/95, §§ 48-57, 4 July 2000, unreported), considers that an examination of the merits of the complaint is required.The Court, having regard to the criteria established in its case-law in respect of the procedural requirements of Article 5 § 4 and, more particularly, to its judgments in the cases of Niedbala v. Poland (no. 27915/95, §§ 48-57, 4 July 2000) and Wloch v. Poland (no. 27785/95, §§ 125-132; 19 October 2000, ECHR-2000-X), considers that an examination of the merits of the complaint is required.
- EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 27785/95
WLOCH v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
The prosecutor's submissions were put on the record of the session (see also Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, judgment of 19 October 2000, §§ 69-73).The Court, having regard to the criteria established in its case-law in respect of the procedural requirements of Article 5 § 4 and, more particularly, to its judgments in the cases of Niedbala v. Poland (no. 27915/95, §§ 48-57, 4 July 2000) and Wloch v. Poland (no. 27785/95, §§ 125-132; 19 October 2000, ECHR-2000-X), considers that an examination of the merits of the complaint is required.
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
The Court will assess the reasonableness of the length of the impugned proceedings in the light of the particular circumstances of the case and having regard to the criteria laid down in its case-law, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 124, ECHR-2000-X). - EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96
KLAMECKI ET 57 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97
The Court has already dealt with a number of similar cases against Poland that arose out of the fact that under domestic criminal legislation applicable at the material time there was no possibility for a person detained at the investigative stage to be brought before anyone other than a prosecutor (see, among many other examples, G.K. v. Poland (dec.), no. 38816/97, 8 December 1998, unreported).