Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUDREVICIUS ET AUTRES c. LITUANIE
Non-violation de l'article 11 - Liberté de réunion et d'association (Article 11-1 - Liberté de réunion pacifique) (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUDREVICIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUDREVICIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
- EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
Papierfundstellen
- NVwZ-RR 2017, 103
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (37)
- EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
It is not normally within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B; Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, §§ 33-34, Series A no. 235-B; and Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269). - EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see, among other authorities, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 49, Series A no. 30; Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-III; Ziliberberg, decision cited above; Galstyan, cited above, § 106; and Primov and Others, cited above, § 125). - EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82
Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
In this area the obligation they enter into under Article 11 of the Convention is an obligation as to measures to be taken and not as to results to be achieved (see Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 34, Series A no. 139, and Fáber, cited above, § 39).
- EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91
Radikalenerlaß
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
Moreover, the level of precision required of domestic legislation - which cannot in any case provide for every eventuality - depends to a considerable degree on the content of the instrument in question, the field it is designed to cover and the number and status of those to whom it is addressed (see Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 48, Series A no. 323, and Rekvényi, cited above, § 34). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
It is not normally within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B; Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, §§ 33-34, Series A no. 235-B; and Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269). - EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
It is not normally within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B; Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, §§ 33-34, Series A no. 235-B; and Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269). - EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99
OSMANI AND OTHERS v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
It is, in any event, for the Court to give a final ruling on the restriction's compatibility with the Convention and this is to be done by assessing the circumstances of a particular case (see Rufi Osmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X, and Galstyan, cited above, § 114). - EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 36487/07
ÇELIK c. TURQUIE (N° 3)
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 28495/06
AKGÖL AND GOL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
A peaceful demonstration should not, in principle, be rendered subject to the threat of a criminal sanction (see Akgöl and Göl v. Turkey, nos. 28495/06 and 28516/06, § 43, 17 May 2011), and notably to deprivation of liberty (see Gün and Others, cited above, § 83). - EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 33112/04
KARATEPE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
33112/04, 36110/04, 40190/04, 41469/04 and 41471/04, § 46, 7 April 2009; Skiba, decision cited above; Çelik v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 36487/07, § 90, 15 November 2012; and Gün and Others, cited above, §§ 73 and 80). - EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 26258/07
RAI ET EVANS c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 31045/10
THE NATIONAL UNION OF RAIL, MARITIME AND TRANSPORT WORKERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 32124/02
NURETTIN ALDEMIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 10659/03
SKIBA c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04
BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 33268/03
ASHUGHYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05
IZCI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08
FÁBER v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 23885/94
FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY PARTY (ÖZDEP) v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07
Alexejew ./. Russland
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1774/11
NEMTSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92
DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05
EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 31684/05
BARRACO c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98
MAESTRI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 8029/07
GÜN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06
PRIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2001 - 24699/94
VgT VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 44158/98
GORZELIK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.05.2014 - 19554/05
TARANENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04
SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 61821/00
ZILIBERBERG v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95
STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 26229/95
GAWEDA v. POLAND
- LG Freiburg, 08.12.2023 - 64/23 NBs 450 Js 23772/22
Notwendigkeit der Einzelfallprüfung und Prüfungsmaßstab bei Blockadeaktionen
Insbesondere wenn Demonstranten keine Gewalt anwenden, ist wesentlich, dass Behörden und Gerichte ein gewisses Maß an Toleranz für friedliche Versammlungen zeigen, weil sonst Art. 11 EMRK substanzlos würde." (NVwZ-RR 2017, 103 Rn. 150).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KUDREVICIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
- EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (16)
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 31684/05
BARRACO c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
As a general principle, the Court nevertheless reiterates that any demonstration in a public place inevitably causes a certain level of disruption to ordinary life, including disruption of traffic, and that it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Galstyan, cited above, §§ 116-117; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 37, ECHR 2007-III; Oya Ataman, cited above, §§ 38-42; and Barraco v. France, no. 31684/05, § 43, 5 March 2009).[16] Barraco v. France, no. 31684/05, 5 March 2009.
[20] Barraco v. France, no. 31684/05, 5 March 2009.
- EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05
EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
It notes that restrictions on freedom of peaceful assembly in public places may serve the protection of the rights of others with a view to preventing disorder and maintaining the orderly circulation of traffic (see Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, § 34, 7 October 2008).[15] Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, § 34, 7 October 2008.
- EuGH, 12.06.2003 - C-112/00
Sperrung der Brennerautobahn durch Demonstranten führt nicht zur Staatshaftung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
In Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v. Republik Österreich, Case C-112/00 [2003], ECR I-05659 the European Court of Justice found that the fact that the Austrian authorities did not ban a demonstration by protesters which resulted in the complete closure of a single major transit route between Austria and Germany for almost thirty hours was not incompatible with Articles 28 and 29 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, read together with Article 10 of that Treaty, provided that that restriction of trade in goods between Member States was justified by the legitimate interest in the protection of fundamental rights, in that case the protesters" freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, which applied both to the Community and the Member States.[21] C-112/00, judgment of 12 June 2003.
- EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01
OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court refers to its case-law to the effect that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-XIII).[13] Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-XIV.
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95
STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
29221/95 and 29225/95, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2001-IX. - EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
[18] Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, § 31. - EGMR, 26.09.2000 - 38881/97
FINDLATER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
Accordingly, the Court finds that the complaint thus falls outside the scope of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, Findlater v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38881/97, 26 September 2000). - EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 37683/97
IAN EDGAR (LIVERPOOL) LIMITED contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
The Court has consistently held that future income is only itself a "possession" once it has been earned, or an enforceable claim to it exists (see Ian Edgar (Liverpool) Ltd v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37683/97, ECHR 2000-I; and Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, 26 June 1986, §§ 39-41, Series A no. 101). - EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08
FÁBER v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
In this context it recalls that any measures interfering with freedom of assembly and expression other than in cases of incitement to violence or rejection of democratic principles do a disservice to democracy and often even endanger it (see Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 37, 24 July 2012). - EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92
DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 37553/05
As such this right covers both private meetings and meetings in public thoroughfares as well as static meetings and public processions; in addition, it can be exercised by individuals and those organising the assembly (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, § 56, ECHR 2003-III). - EGMR, 26.06.1986 - 8543/79
VAN MARLE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96
Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04
BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE
- EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM