Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RIERA BLUME AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RIERA BLUME ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 5-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 9 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.03.1999 - 37680/97
• EGMR, 14.10.1999 - 37680/97

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.1999 - 37680/97

  In order to determine whether someone has been deprived of his liberty within the meaning of Article 5, the starting-point must be his concrete situation, and account must be taken of a whole range of criteria such as the type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see the following judgments: Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 24, §§ 58-59; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 33, § 92; and Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 848, § 42).

• EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04

  RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA

  In order to determine whether someone has been "deprived of his liberty" within the meaning of Article 5, the starting point must be her concrete situation and account must be taken of a whole range of criteria such as the type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, §§ 58-59, Series A no. 22; Guzzardi, cited above, § 92; and Riera Blume and Others v. Spain, no. 37680/97, § 28, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 26828/06

  KURIC ET AUTRES c. SLOVÉNIE

  The Slovenian constitutional appeal is thus similar to those existing in, for example, Germany, Spain or the Czech Republic which make it possible for the constitutional courts of those member States to remedy violations of fundamental rights and freedoms (see Riera Blume and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 37680/97, ECHR 1999-II; Hartman v. the Czech Republic, no. 53341/99, § 49, ECHR 2003-VIII; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 62, ECHR 2006-VII; and, by contrast, Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 42-46, ECHR 2006-XIV).
• EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 48020/12

  GOLUB v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  In order to determine whether someone has been "deprived of his liberty" within the meaning of Article 5, the starting point must be his concrete situation and account must be taken of a whole range of criteria such as the type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, §§ 58-59, Series A no. 22; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39; and Riera Blume and Others v. Spain, no. 37680/97, § 28, ECHR 1999-VII; De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 80, 23 February 2017).

 
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 40765/02

  APOSTOL v. GEORGIA

  Such a constitutional complaint also makes it possible to remedy violations resulting immediately and directly from an act or omission of a judicial body, regardless of the facts that had given rise to the proceedings; the abrogation of an unconstitutional law results in the annulment of all the final decisions made by the courts or public authorities on the basis of that law (see Riera Blume and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 37680/97, ECHR 1999-II, and Voggenreiter v. Germany, no. 47169/99, § 23, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 22429/05

  KOVAL AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  The second applicant believed that this person had acted with the support and assistance of the police officers (see Riera Blume and Others v. Spain, no. 37680/97, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 45905/99

  SOLA CASTRO contre l'ESPAGNE

  En outre, et pour ce qui est du non-épuisement des voies de recours internes allégué par le gouvernement, le requérant se réfère au paragraphe 20 de l'arrêt Riera Blume et autres contre Espagne (n° 37680/97, CEDH 1999-VII) et conclut que cette exception doit être rejetée puisque, ayant choisi la voie pénale, il a épuisé toutes les voies de recours qui lui étaient accessibles.
• EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 36445/97

  SABLON c. BELGIQUE

  Il en va de même des procédures introduites par le requérant en vue d'obtenir l'exécution du jugement du 6 septembre 1993 et de la demande de restitution mise en Å?uvre par la citation du 2 juillet 1996 (voir à cet égard mutatis mutandis Basic c. Autriche (décision), n° 37680/97, 16 mars 1999, CEDH 1999-II).