Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 17705/05, 37857/05, 44103/05 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ILIEVA ET AUTRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ILIEVA AND OTHERS AGAINST BULGARIA AND 2 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 17705/05
- EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 17705/05, 37857/05, 44103/05
Wird zitiert von ...
- EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09
DIMITAR YORDANOV v. BULGARIA
For the Court, the fact that that company was a separate legal entity under domestic law (see, for example, Ilieva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17705/05, § 36, 3 February 2015) cannot be decisive to rule out the State's direct responsibility under the Convention (see Liseytseva and Maslov v. Russia, nos. 39483/05 and 40527/10, § 188, 9 October 2014, and Ali?.ic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, § 114, ECHR 2014).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 37857/05 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARAIVANOVA AND MILEVA v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 37857/05
The principle of legal certainty and respect for the res judicata effect of final judgments requires that no party should be entitled to seek review of a final and binding judgment merely for the purpose of obtaining a rehearing and a fresh determination of the case (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX, and Sivova and Koleva, cited above, § 66).