Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR, 01.10.2020 | EGMR, 06.06.2000

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2002,32412
EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97 (https://dejure.org/2002,32412)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.06.2002 - 38361/97 (https://dejure.org/2002,32412)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Juni 2002 - 38361/97 (https://dejure.org/2002,32412)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,32412) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 2 in respect of death of applicant's son Violation of Art. 2 in respect of failure to provide timely medical care Violation of Art. 2 due to lack of effective investigation Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 13 No violation ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ANGUELOVA c. BULGARIE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 2 quant au décès du fils de la requérante Violation de l'art. 2 quant au retard apporté à dispenser des soins médicaux Violation de l'art. 2 en raison de l'absence d'enquête effective Violation de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 5 Violation ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (204)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

  • EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

    VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; and Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI).

    At the root of this injurious escape from reality lies the evidentiary rule which the Court has inflicted on itself: "The Court recalls... that the standard of proof required under the Convention is 'proof beyond reasonable doubt'." [Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI] The majority found that in the present case it had not been established "beyond reasonable doubt" that in the death of the 17-year-old Rom, Anguel Zabchekov that followed the devoted attentions of police officers, his ethnicity was "a determining factor" with those police officers who facilitated the young Rom's access to the fastest lane from Razgrad to eternity.

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; and Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI).

    The Court has also, by an admirable process of judicial activism "created" the concept of a "procedural violation" of Article 2 [McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324], and, more recently, of Article 3 [Assenov and Others, cited above].

  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    Thus also the Court, in a forward-looking decision, has held that the failure by the Government to submit information to which only it could have access, may give rise to inferences that the applicant's charges are well-founded [Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tas v. Turkey, no. 24396/94, 14 November 2000].
     
  • EGMR, 14.11.2000 - 24396/94

    TAS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    Thus also the Court, in a forward-looking decision, has held that the failure by the Government to submit information to which only it could have access, may give rise to inferences that the applicant's charges are well-founded [Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tas v. Turkey, no. 24396/94, 14 November 2000].
  • EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95

    T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    Furthermore, in appropriate cases, compensation for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage flowing from the breach should in principle be available as part of the range of redress (see, as a recent authority, T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-V).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2002 - 51564/99

    Belgien, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Abschiebunghaft, Freiheit …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    Reliance on inferences, legal presumptions and a shift in the onus of evidence also proved decisive in the recent Conka case, in which the Court, rather than requiring from the applicants proof beyond reasonable doubt that their expulsion was in pursuance of a collective expulsion policy, found a violation by starting from the opposite end of the syllogism: "The procedure followed [by the State authorities] did not enable it [the Court] to eliminate all doubt that the expulsion might have been collective" [Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I].
  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    The Convention has to be applied by the Court in such a way as to guarantee "not rights that are theoretical or illusory, but rights that are practical and effective" [Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37].
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, concerning autopsies, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; concerning forensic evidence, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

    MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    The Court does not deem it necessary to make a separate finding under Article 3 in respect of the deficiencies in the investigation (see Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 120, ECHR 2000-III), having already dealt with that question under Article 2 of the Convention (see paragraphs 132-46 above).
  • EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

    GÜL v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
    The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, concerning autopsies, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; concerning forensic evidence, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  • EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  • EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

    D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    En 2002, 1e juge Bonello trouvait « particulièrement perturbant que la Cour, en cinquante ans et plus de travail judiciaire opiniâtre, n'ait pas encore trouvé à ce jour un seul exemple de violation du droit [garanti par l'article 2 ou par l'article 3] fondée sur la race (...)'(Anguelova c. Bulgarie, no 38361/97, CEDH 2002-IV, opinion dissidente).
  • EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

    Opuz ./. Türkei

    En effet, dans certaines circonstances, lorsque les événements en cause, dans leur totalité ou pour une large part, sont connus exclusivement des autorités, la charge de la preuve pèse selon la Cour sur les autorités, qui doivent fournir une explication satisfaisante et convaincante (Salman c. Turquie [GC], no 21986/93, § 100, CEDH 2000-VII ; Anguelova c. Bulgarie, no 38361/97, § 111, CEDH 2002-IV).
  • EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

    MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

    The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 137, ECHR 2002-IV).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 41488/98, 38361/97, 77938/11, 43233/98, 36613/08, 67258/13, 38152/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,43034
EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 41488/98, 38361/97, 77938/11, 43233/98, 36613/08, 67258/13, 38152/11 (https://dejure.org/2020,43034)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.10.2020 - 41488/98, 38361/97, 77938/11, 43233/98, 36613/08, 67258/13, 38152/11 (https://dejure.org/2020,43034)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Oktober 2020 - 41488/98, 38361/97, 77938/11, 43233/98, 36613/08, 67258/13, 38152/11 (https://dejure.org/2020,43034)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43034) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...

  • EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 59273/10

    PETKOV ET PARNAROV c. BULGARIE

    Pour répondre à cette question, elle doit prendre en compte les blessures occasionnées et les circonstances dans lesquelles elles l'ont été (Osman c. Bulgarie, no 43233/98, § 60, 16 février 2006, et R.L. et M.-J.D. c. France, no 44568/98, § 68, 19 mai 2004).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2000,43202
EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97 (https://dejure.org/2000,43202)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.06.2000 - 38361/97 (https://dejure.org/2000,43202)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Juni 2000 - 38361/97 (https://dejure.org/2000,43202)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,43202) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 24645/94

    BUSCARINI ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97
    In order to comply with the rule, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 26, ECHR 1999- ).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97
    The Court finds on the basis of the Convention organs" case-law that in such circumstances the parent of the deceased is undoubtedly entitled to lodge a complaint in respect of all issues under the Convention which may arise out of the tragic events complained of (see, among many other authorities, appl. no. 7467/76, Dec. 13.12.76, DR 8, p. 220; the Yasa judgment, cited above; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999- ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999- ).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97
    The Court finds on the basis of the Convention organs" case-law that in such circumstances the parent of the deceased is undoubtedly entitled to lodge a complaint in respect of all issues under the Convention which may arise out of the tragic events complained of (see, among many other authorities, appl. no. 7467/76, Dec. 13.12.76, DR 8, p. 220; the Yasa judgment, cited above; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999- ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999- ).
  • EKMR, 13.12.1976 - 7467/76

    X. v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97
    The Court finds on the basis of the Convention organs" case-law that in such circumstances the parent of the deceased is undoubtedly entitled to lodge a complaint in respect of all issues under the Convention which may arise out of the tragic events complained of (see, among many other authorities, appl. no. 7467/76, Dec. 13.12.76, DR 8, p. 220; the Yasa judgment, cited above; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999- ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999- ).
  • EKMR, 14.10.1996 - 25068/94

    INCE v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97
    In this respect the Court recalls that the requirements of the six months" rule are complied with if the first communication has been made within the time-limit, although it may have arrived several days after its expiry (see Erdogdu and Ince v. Turkey [GC], nos. 25067 and 25068/94, § 30, ECHR 1999 - ).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht