Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GARCÍA MANIBARDO v. SPAIN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GARCÍA MANIBARDO c. ESPAGNE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 38695/97
• EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97

Wird zitiert von ... (25)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention does not compel the Contracting States to set up courts of appeal or of cassation (see, among other authorities, the Delcourt v. Belgium judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 13-15, §§ 25-26).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97

  The Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective (see the Airey v. Ireland judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, pp. 12-14, § 24).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 18064/91

  HIRO BALANI v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97

  The Court observes that it has in previous cases awarded sums claimed as legal fees before the Spanish Constitutional Court (see, among other authorities, the Hiro Balani v. Spain judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-B, p. 31, §§ 32-33, and the Castillo Algar v. Spain judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3118, §§ 53, 54 and 57).

• EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 44787/98

  P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Or les droits consacrés par la Convention ne peuvent demeurer purement théoriques ni virtuels, car « la Convention doit être interprétée et appliquée de manière à garantir des droits concrets et effectifs » (arrêts Comingersoll S.A. c. Portugal [GC], no 35382/97, § 35, CEDH 2000-IV ; Beer et Regan c. Allemagne [GC], no 28934/95, § 57, 18 février 1999, non publié ; et García Manibardo c. Espagne, no 38695/97, § 43, CEDH 2000-II).
• EGMR, 04.06.2015 - 5425/11

  RUSLAN YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE

  This is particularly so of the right of access to court in view of the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32, and García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 43, ECHR 2000-II).
• EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

  KUTIC v. CROATIA

  La Cour rappelle que la Convention a pour but de protéger des droits non pas théoriques ou illusoires, mais concrets et effectifs (voir, mutatis mutandis, les arrêts Airey c. Irlande du 9 octobre 1979, série A no 32, pp. 12-14, § 24, et García Manibardo c. Espagne, no 38695/97, § 43, CEDH 2000-II).

 
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 2611/07

  DOBRIC v. SERBIA

  Being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of any case before it, the Court considers that the above complaints fall to be examined under Articles 6 § 1 of the Convention only (see Akdeniz v. Turkey, no. 25165/94, § 88, 31 May 2005, and García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II).

  In the case of Garcia Manibardo v. Spain (no. 38695/97, § 45, ECHR 2000-II) the Court articulated the principle that a disproportionate hindrance of the right of access to a court is in breach of Article 6 of the Convention.

• EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 31871/96

  Rechtssache S. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Bestehen solche Gerichte jedoch, so müssen die Garantien nach Artikel 6 erfüllt sein, u.a. durch Sicherstellung eines wirksamen Zugangs zu den Gerichten, damit Prozessparteien eine Entscheidung in Bezug auf ihre "zivilrechtlichen Ansprüche und Verpflichtungen" erwirken können (siehe sinngemäß Urteil Delcourt ./. Belgien vom 17. Januar 1970, Serie A, Band 11, S. 13-14, Nr. 25 und Kudla ./. Polen (GK), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30210/96, Nr. 122, EuGHMR 2000-XI; siehe auch García Manibardo ./. Spanien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 38695/97, Nr. 39, EuGHMR 2000-II).
• EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 34045/96

  Rechtssache H. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Bestehen solche Gerichte jedoch, so müssen die Garantien nach Artikel 6 erfüllt sein, u.a. durch Sicherstellung eines wirksamen Zugangs zu den Gerichten, damit Prozessparteien eine Entscheidung in Bezug auf ihre "zivilrechtlichen Ansprüche und Verpflichtungen" erwirken können (siehe sinngemäß Urteil Delcourt ./. Belgien vom 17. Januar 1970, Serie A, Band 11, S. 13-14, Nr. 25 und Kudla ./. Polen (GK), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30210/96, Nr. 122, EuGHMR 2000-XI; siehe auch García Manibardo ./. Spanien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 38695/97, Nr. 39, EuGHMR 2000-II).
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 32299/08

  JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA

  Nevertheless, the "right to a court", of which the right of access is one aspect, is not absolute; it is subject to limitations permitted by implication, in particular where the conditions of admissibility of an appeal are concerned since by its very nature it calls for regulation by the State, which enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in this regard (see, for example, García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II, and Mortier v. France, no. 42195/98, § 33, 31 July 2001).
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 31517/12

  MIESSEN c. BELGIQUE

  Néanmoins, un État qui se dote de juridictions de cette nature a l'obligation de veiller à ce que les justiciables jouissent auprès d'elles des garanties fondamentales de l'article 6 (voir, entre autres, Delcourt c. Belgique, 17 janvier 1970, § 25, série A no 11, Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 122, CEDH 2000-XI, RTBF c. Belgique, no 50084/06, § 70, CEDH 2011 (extraits), et Morice c. France [GC], no 29369/10, § 88, 23 avril 2015), notamment en ce qu'il assure aux plaideurs un droit effectif d'accès aux tribunaux pour faire statuer sur les contestations relatives à leurs droits et obligations de caractère civil (voir, parmi d'autres, Levages Prestations Services c. France, 23 octobre 1996, § 44, Recueil 1996-V, García Manibardo c. Espagne, no 38695/97, § 39, CEDH 2000-II, Andrejeva c. Lettonie [GC], no 55707/00, § 97, CEDH 2009, et L'Erablière A.S.B.L. c. Belgique, no 49230/07, § 36, CEDH 2009 (extraits)).
• EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 32806/09

  EGIC v. CROATIA

  The "right to a court", of which the right of access is one aspect, is not absolute; it is subject to limitations permitted by implication, in particular where the conditions of admissibility of an appeal are concerned, since by its very nature it calls for regulation by the State, which enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in this regard (see, for example, García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II, and Mortier v. France, no. 42195/98, § 33, 31 July 2001).
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 30671/08

  MASIREVIC v. SERBIA

  Nevertheless, the right to a court is not absolute and may be subject to limitations, in particular where the conditions of admissibility of an appeal are concerned, since by its very nature it calls for regulation by the State which enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in this matter (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 38, Series A no. 18; García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II, and Mortier v. France, no. 42195/98, § 33, 31 July 2001).
• EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 31150/09

  ERFAR-AVEF c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  ZBOROVSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 66048/09

  KONI v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 23257/04

  FALIE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 1005/08

  DOKIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 7261/06

  STAVEBNA SPOLOCNOST TATRY POPRAD, S.R.O. v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 31351/06

  STEULET c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 24562/03

  CLINIQUE SAINTE MARIE c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 16846/02

  LABERGERE c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 48512/20

  DAHMAN BENDHIMAN v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 55426/00

  ILLAN CONTRERAS contre l'ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 4008/05

  BACCHINI c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 45343/08

  GOMEZ CESPON c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 18806/02

  JESINA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 41665/02

  RODOPLU c. TURQUIE