Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 39272/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55621) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRAVTSOV v. RUSSIA
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR - 23516/08 (anhängig)
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 39272/04
The Court reiterates that the right of access to a court secured under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention would be illusory if a Contracting State's domestic legal system allowed a final binding judicial decision to remain inoperative to the detriment of one party (see, among many other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34, ECHR 2002-III, and Société Cofinfo v. France (dec.), no. 23516/08, 12 October 2010). - EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 5124/03
GIZZATOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 39272/04
The Court recalls in this connection that a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances but it may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 20, 13 January 2005). - EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 31475/05
KENEDI v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 39272/04
The Court is mindful that information is by definition a perishable commodity (see, mutatis mutandis, Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, § 70, ECHR 2010-...), therefore, grounds for delay in providing the personal information to the individual concerned - when such disclosure is ordered by a domestic court - shall be particularly exceptional (see Kenedi v. Hungary, no. 31475/05, §§ 39 and 45, ECHR 2009-...).
- EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3634/04
GAVRIS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
3634/04, 56557/10 and 26300/08, as regards the judgments concerning financial orders, the applicants have lost their victim status since the judgments have been duly enforced and within a reasonable time (see, among many other authorities, Kravtsov v. Russia, no. 39272/04, § 24, 5 April 2011, and Dumitru and others v. Romania (dec.), no. 57265/08, §§ 50-51, 4 September 2012).