Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 05.01.2017

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,31310
EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,31310)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.10.2016 - 3933/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,31310)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. Oktober 2016 - 3933/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,31310)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,31310) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    PISKUNOV v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 12983/14

    PATRANIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The provisions of domestic law establishing the legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Patranin v. Russia (no. 12983/14, §§ 86-88, 23 July 2015); Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Koryak v. Russia, (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 312/10

    BEKAURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The Court finds that following the unambiguous agreement of the applicant with the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the case should be treated, in substance, as a friendly settlement between the parties (see Bekauri and others v. Georgia (dec.), no. 312/10, ECHR 2015, and Gabura v. Moldova (dec.), no. 12197/08, ECHR 2011).
  • EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09

    GORBULYA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The Court has on many occasions established that there is a lack of effective domestic remedies to complain about the quality of medical treatment in detention and about the conditions of such detention (see, among many other authorities, Patranin, cited above, § 86; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 106, 4 December 2014; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 56-58, 6 March 2014; Reshetnyak, cited above, §§ 65-73; Dirdizov, cited above, § 75; Koryak, cited above, §§ 86-93; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 101).
  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

    DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The provisions of domestic law establishing the legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Patranin v. Russia (no. 12983/14, §§ 86-88, 23 July 2015); Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Koryak v. Russia, (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    For a summary of the relevant domestic and international law provisions governing conditions of detention see Ananyev and Others v. Russia (nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 25-58, 10 January 2012).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 24677/10

    KORYAK v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The provisions of domestic law establishing the legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Patranin v. Russia (no. 12983/14, §§ 86-88, 23 July 2015); Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Koryak v. Russia, (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11

    NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The Court has on many occasions established that there is a lack of effective domestic remedies to complain about the quality of medical treatment in detention and about the conditions of such detention (see, among many other authorities, Patranin, cited above, § 86; Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 106, 4 December 2014; Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, §§ 56-58, 6 March 2014; Reshetnyak, cited above, §§ 65-73; Dirdizov, cited above, § 75; Koryak, cited above, §§ 86-93; and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 101).
  • EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 56027/10

    RESHETNYAK v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The provisions of domestic law establishing the legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Patranin v. Russia (no. 12983/14, §§ 86-88, 23 July 2015); Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Koryak v. Russia, (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

    ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    In the light of the above finding the Court sees no need to examine separately the conditions of the applicant's detention, which is simply a further aspect of his treatment by the detention authorities and adds nothing to the violation that has already been found (see, mutatis mutandis, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 177-78, ECHR 2004-II).
  • EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 30575/08

    IVKO v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12
    The relevant provisions of domestic and international law on the general health care of detainees are set out in Ivko v. Russia (no. 30575/08, §§ 55-62, 15 December 2015).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 41828/10

    GURENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 22.03.2011 - 12197/08

    GABURA v. MOLDOVA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 30125/06, 33690/12, 51252/09, 70164/14, 45705/13, 42270/13, 63378/13, 41785/13, 53937/13, 20888/14, 20988/13, 70371/13, 7805/07, 47236/11, 3933/12, 60277/14, 47875/13, 2460/10, 19972/14, 11823/12, 64127/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,14737
EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 30125/06, 33690/12, 51252/09, 70164/14, 45705/13, 42270/13, 63378/13, 41785/13, 53937/13, 20888/14, 20988/13, 70371/13, 7805/07, 47236/11, 3933/12, 60277/14, 47875/13, 2460/10, 19972/14, 11823/12, 64127/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,14737)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.01.2017 - 30125/06, 33690/12, 51252/09, 70164/14, 45705/13, 42270/13, 63378/13, 41785/13, 53937/13, 20888/14, 20988/13, 70371/13, 7805/07, 47236/11, 3933/12, 60277/14, 47875/13, 2460/10, 19972/14, 11823/12, 64127/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,14737)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Januar 2017 - 30125/06, 33690/12, 51252/09, 70164/14, 45705/13, 42270/13, 63378/13, 41785/13, 53937/13, 20888/14, 20988/13, 70371/13, 7805/07, 47236/11, 3933/12, 60277/14, 47875/13, 2460/10, 19972/14, 11823/12, 64127/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,14737)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14737) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht