Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOVATCH c. UKRAINE

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Exception préliminaire jointe au fond (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de P1-3 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOVACH v. UKRAINE

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of P1-3 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02
• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 39424/02

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

  CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02

  The object and purpose of the Convention, which is an instrument for the protection of human rights, requires its provisions to be interpreted and applied in such a way as to make their stipulations not theoretical or illusory but practical and effective (see, for example, United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 18-19, § 33, and Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 100, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02

  It is, however, for the Court to determine in the last resort whether the requirements of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 have been complied with; it has to satisfy itself that the conditions do not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and that the means employed are not disproportionate (see Labita v. Italy [GC] no. 26772/95, § 201, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99

  PODKOLZINA c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02

  Lastly, the procedure for declaring a candidate ineligible must be such as to ensure a fair and objective decision and prevent any abuse of power on the part of the relevant authority (Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 35, ECHR 2002-II).

 
• EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

  AZINAS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02

  The rule of exhaustion of domestic normally requires that the complaints intended to be made subsequently at the international level should have been aired before the domestic courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III).
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 33554/03

  LYKOUREZOS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02

  Furthermore, the Court has considered that this Article guarantees the individual's right to stand for election and, once elected, to sit as a member of parliament (see Lykourezos v. Greece, no. 33554/03, § 50, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 39424/02

  However, having regard to the preparatory work to Article 3 of the Protocol and the interpretation of the provision in the context of the Convention as a whole, the Court has established that it guarantees individual rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see, among many other authorities, Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, pp. 22-23, §§ 46-51; Hirst v. the United Kingdom (No. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, § 56-57, ECHR 2005-IX; and, more recently, Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278/00, § 102, 16 March 2006).

• BVerfG, 30.06.2009 - 2 BvE 2/08

  Zustimmungsgesetz zum Vertrag von Lissabon mit Grundgesetz vereinbar; …

  In diese Gleichbehandlung bezieht der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte den Zählwert der Stimmen ausdrücklich ein, während er für die Erfolgswertgleichheit und die gleichen Siegchancen der Kandidaten Ausnahmen zulässt (EGMR…, Urteil vom 2. März 1987, Nr. 9267/81, Mathieu-Mohin und Clerfayt/Belgien, Rn. 54; Urteil vom 7. Februar 2008, Nr. 39424/02, Kovach/Ukraine, Rn. 49; zur Anwendung des Art. 3 Zusatzprotokoll auf das Europäische Parlament als "gesetzgebende Körperschaft": EGMR…, Urteil vom 18. Februar 1999, Nr. 24833/94, Matthews/Vereinigtes Königreich, Rn. 40 = NJW 1999, S. 3107 ).