Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56419) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHARCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
- EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (14)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Nevertheless, the State must ensure that the health and well-being of detainees are adequately secured by, among other things, providing them with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Hurtado v. Switzerland, 28 January 1994, Series A no. 280-A).The Court reiterates that, in assessing the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings in question, it is necessary to have regard to the particular circumstances of the case and the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicants and of the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicants (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 124, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...). - EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95
Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...).
- EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
DRIZA c. ALBANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
However, the Court's concern is to facilitate the rapid and effective suppression of a shortcoming found in the national system of protection of human rights (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04
S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...). - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it has adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Even the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of this provision (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII,). - EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it has adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Even the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of this provision (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII,). - EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99
Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
In accordance with this provision the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI). - EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
Other relevant domestic law is summarised in the judgments of Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine (no. 54825/00, §§ 53-61, ECHR 2005-II (extracts)), and Shalimov v. Ukraine (no. 20808/02, §§ 39-42, 4 March 2010). - EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05
SARBAN v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
The authorities must also ensure that a comprehensive record is kept concerning the detainee's state of health and the treatment he underwent while in detention (see, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)), and that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at curing the detainee's illnesses or preventing their aggravation, rather than addressing them on a symptomatic basis (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109, 114; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006). - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00
KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 38779/04
FELDMAN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90
HURTADO c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 23893/03
KAVERZIN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 760/03
VASILIY IVASHCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.01.2014 - 29085/06
LYUBARETS v. UKRAINE
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Ukraine, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 and one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, 10 February 2011; Vergelskyy v. Ukraine, no. 19312/06, 12 March 2009; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,73139) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
- EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
The Court, being a master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, does not consider itself bound by the legal characterisation to these complaints given by the applicant (see, among many other authorities, Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 223, §§ 44-45; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 127, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
The Court, being a master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, does not consider itself bound by the legal characterisation to these complaints given by the applicant (see, among many other authorities, Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 223, §§ 44-45; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 127, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)). - EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
Relevant domestic law and practice are summarised in the judgment of the Court in Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine (no. 54825/00, §§ 53-61, ECHR 2005-... (extracts)).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 (https://dejure.org/2017,36337)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 (https://dejure.org/2017,36337)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. September 2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04 (https://dejure.org/2017,36337)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,36337) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHARCHENKO CONTRE L'UKRAINE ET 35 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHARCHENKO AGAINST UKRAINE AND 35 OTHER CASES
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.11.2006 - 40107/02
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02
- EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02, 71660/11, 27889/03, 25725/02, 38800/12, 27672/03, 16505/02, 42813/05, 6759/11, 17650/02, 38717/04, 13371/06, 49122/07, 16447/04, 37645/10, 37198/10, 19805/08, 34211/04, 2161/02, 37466/04, 15816/04, 11930/09, 12222/09, 4634/04, 74297/11, 5522/04
Wird zitiert von ... (5)
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 5911/05
KLEUTIN v. UKRAINE
The Court must, in addition, be satisfied that, during the period under consideration, the detention was compatible with the purpose of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which is to prevent persons from being deprived of their liberty in an arbitrary manner (see Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, §§ 41-42, 6 November 2008).He referred in that connection to the judgment in the case of Yeloyev v. Ukraine (no.17283/02, § 50, 6 November 2008), in which the Court noted that it had already examined and found a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention in a number of cases concerning the practice of holding defendants in custody solely on the basis of the fact that a bill of indictment had been submitted to the trial court.
- EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09
BELERI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
In their absence, the criminal proceedings had not been stayed, unlike in Smirnova v. Russia (nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 35, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)); Yeloyev v. Ukraine (no. 17283/02, §§ 14-15, 6 November 2008); and Girolami v. Italy (19 February 1991, § 9, Series A no. 196-E).According to the settled case-law of the Court, an accused person cannot rely on a period of being a fugitive when he was seeking to avoid being brought to justice in his home country (see, for example, Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 84, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), and Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, § 70, 6 November 2008, where the periods when the applicants had absconded were excluded from the overall length of the proceedings).
- EGMR, 19.01.2012 - 39884/05
KORNEYKOVA v. UKRAINE
The Court must, in addition, be satisfied that the detention, during the period under consideration, was compatible with the purpose of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which is to prevent persons from being deprived of their liberty in an arbitrary manner (see Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, §§ 41-42, 6 November 2008). - EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 17650/02
GAVAZHUK v. UKRAINE
Thus, the applicant's detention between 2 September and 2 November 1999 is covered by the relevant reservation of Ukraine valid at that time and falls outside the scope of the Court's assessment of the lawfulness of the applicant's detention (see Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, § 112, ECHR 2005-II (extracts), and Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, § 45, 6 November 2008). - EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 16447/04
NIKOLAY KUCHERENKO v. UKRAINE
In those cases it has held that the practice of keeping defendants in detention without a specific legal basis or clear rules governing their situation - with the result that they may be deprived of their liberty for an unlimited period without judicial authorisation - is incompatible with the principles of legal certainty and the protection from arbitrariness, which are common threads throughout the Convention and the rule of law (see Korchuganova v. Russia, no. 75039/01, § 57, 8 June 2006; Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, §§ 67-68, 2 March 2006; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 146-48, ECHR 2005-X; and Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, § 50, 7 October 2008).