Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 40154/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,46286) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YÜKSEL v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 40154/98
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 40154/98
However, the last stage in the exhaustion of these remedies may be reached after the lodging of the application but before the Court is called upon to pronounce on the issue of admissibility (see, mutatis mutandis. Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1991, Series A no. 13, p. 38, § 91). - EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96
CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 40154/98
The Court observes that Article 6 does not give a right to secure the prosecution and conviction of third parties ( see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,35185) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MEHMET EMIN YÜKSEL v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 40154/98
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01
MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA
Finally, the Court reiterates that for an investigation into alleged ill-treatment by State agents to be effective, it should be independent (see ÖÄ?ur v. Turkey, [GC], no. 21954/93, ECHR 1999-III, §§ 91-92; see also Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 37, 20 July 2004). - EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03
GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA
In these circumstances, bearing in mind the authorities" obligation to account for injuries caused to persons under their control in custody, and in the absence of a convincing and plausible explanation by the Government in the instant case, the Court considers that it can draw inferences from the Government's conduct and finds it established to the standard of proof required in the Convention proceedings that the injuries sustained by the applicant were the result of the treatment of which he complained and for which the Government bore responsibility (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 88, ECHR 1999-V; Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 30, 20 July 2004; Mikheyev, cited above, §§ 104-105; and Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, §§ 78-79, 15 May 2008). - EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 19223/04
VLADIMIR FEDOROV v. RUSSIA
In these circumstances, bearing in mind the authorities" obligation to account for injuries caused to persons within their control in custody, and in the absence of a convincing and plausible explanation by the Government in the instant case, the Court considers that it can draw inferences from the Government's conduct and finds it established to the standard of proof required in the Convention proceedings that the injuries sustained by the applicant were the result of the treatment of which he complained and for which the Government bore responsibility (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 88, ECHR 1999-V; Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 30, 20 July 2004; Mikheyev, cited above, §§ 104-105; and Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, §§ 78-79, 15 May 2008).