Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,15203
EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,15203)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19.04.2016 - 41252/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,15203)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19. April 2016 - 41252/12 (https://dejure.org/2016,15203)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,15203) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12
    It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among many other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 69, ECHR 1999-IX, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

    PEERS v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12
    The Court of Appeal also had regard to the practice of the Court to the effect that the State should protect inmates" physical health (it relied on Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

    Mord an James Bulger

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12
    It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among many other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 69, ECHR 1999-IX, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 28300/06

    SLAWOMIR MUSIAL v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12
    In deciding whether or not the detention of a seriously ill person has raised an issue under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court has taken into account three elements: (a) the medical condition of the prisoner, (b) the adequacy of the medical assistance and care provided in detention and (c) the advisability of maintaining the detention measure in view of the state of health of the applicant (see Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, §§ 40-42, ECHR 2002-IX; Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 53, 2 December 2004; Sakkopoulos v. Greece, no. 61828/00, § 39, 15 January 2004; and Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 88, 20 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2004 - 61828/00

    SAKKOPOULOS c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 41252/12
    In deciding whether or not the detention of a seriously ill person has raised an issue under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court has taken into account three elements: (a) the medical condition of the prisoner, (b) the adequacy of the medical assistance and care provided in detention and (c) the advisability of maintaining the detention measure in view of the state of health of the applicant (see Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, §§ 40-42, ECHR 2002-IX; Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 53, 2 December 2004; Sakkopoulos v. Greece, no. 61828/00, § 39, 15 January 2004; and Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 88, 20 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 44214/11

    SUSLOVA v. RUSSIA

    At the outset the Court observes that in cases concerning medical care in prison it most often has had to deal with complaints of prisoners affected with severe or very severe ailments, making their normal daily functioning very difficult (see Bagdonavicius v. Lithuania, no. 41252/12, § 76, 19 April 2016, and Kulikowski v. Poland (no. 2), no. 16831/07, § 71, 9 October 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht