Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,55281
EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,55281)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.11.2012 - 41461/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,55281)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. November 2012 - 41461/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,55281)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55281) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture ...

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (18)

  • EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06

    SADRETDINOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many others, Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012; Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Goroshchenya v. Russia, no. 38711/03, 22 April 2010; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Avdeyev and Veryayev v. Russia, no. 2737/04, 9 July 2009; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Matyush v. Russia, no. 14850/03, 9 December 2008; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Mishketkul and Others v. Russia, no. 36911/02, 24 May 2007; Ignatov v. Russia, no. 27193/02, 24 May 2007; Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708/02, 24 May 2007; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, 7 April 2005; Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, 8 February 2005; and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 27297/07

    KOLOMENSKIY c. RUSSIE

    Elle rappelle avoir souvent conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 3 de la Convention dans des affaires où les tribunaux internes avaient maintenu le requérant en détention en se fondant essentiellement sur la gravité des charges et sans envisager d'autres mesures préventives (Khoudobine c. Russie, no 59696/00, CEDH 2006-XII, Dolgova c. Russie, no 11886/05, 2 mars 2006, Michketkoul et autres c. Russie, no 36911/02, 24 mai 2007, Choukhardine c. Russie, no 65734/01, 28 juin 2007, Belov c. Russie, no 22053/02, 3 juillet 2008, Lamazhyk c. Russie, no 20571/04, 30 juillet 2009, Sutyagin c. Russie, no 30024/02, 3 mai 2011, Romanova c. Russie, no 23215/02, 11 octobre 2011, et Dirdizov c. Russie, no 41461/10, 27 novembre 2012).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 51497/08

    NAUMOV v. RUSSIA

    The provisions of the domestic law establishing legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013), and Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 3933/12

    PISKUNOV v. RUSSIA

    The provisions of domestic law establishing the legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Patranin v. Russia (no. 12983/14, §§ 86-88, 23 July 2015); Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Koryak v. Russia, (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 41090/05

    SERGEYEV c. RUSSIE

    Elle rappelle avoir souvent conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 3 dans des affaires où les tribunaux internes avaient maintenu le requérant en détention en se fondant essentiellement sur la gravité des charges et en recourant à des formules stéréotypées sans évoquer des faits précis ou sans envisager d'autres mesures préventives (Khoudobine c. Russie, no 59696/00, CEDH 2006-XII, Dolgova c. Russie, no 11886/05, 2 mars 2006, Michketkoul et autres c. Russie, no 36911/02, 24 mai 2007, Choukhardine c. Russie, no 65734/01, 28 juin 2007, Belov c. Russie, no 22053/02, 3 juillet 2008, Lamazhyk c. Russie, no 20571/04, 30 juillet 2009, Gultyayeva, précité, Sutyagin c. Russie, no 30024/02, 3 mai 2011, Romanova c. Russie, no 23215/02, 11 octobre 2011, et Dirdizov c. Russie, no 41461/10, 27 novembre 2012).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2019 - 30709/10

    MAZITOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of pre-trial detention (see, for example, Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012), as well as concerning the other complaints under the well-established case-law (see the appended table below) (Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

    DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA

    For relevant provisions of domestic law see Koryak v. Russia (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013).
  • EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

    CHIRYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia (see, in general, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012; and also, as regards the conditions of detention obtaining in the IZ-71/1 remand prison at the material time, Kozhokar v. Russia, no. 33099/08, §§ 95-98, 16 December 2010, and Shcherbakov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 34959/07, §§ 67-74, 24 October 2013).
  • EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 29998/04

    PRIGARIN v. RUSSIA

    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Russia, its practice concerning complaints about the excessive length of pre-trial detention and a violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, § 108, 27 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 52025/13

    MUMRYAYEV v. RUSSIA

    It has found that no effective remedies existed in Russia for applicants who complained of ongoing deterioration of their health in view of a lack of proper medical care in detention (see, among others, Reshetnyak v. Russia, no. 56027/10, § 80, 8 January 2013; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, § 91, 27 November 2012; Koryak v. Russia, no. 24677/10, § 95, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 49038/12

    GUSEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 39630/03

    RUSAKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 46144/12

    TERENINA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 17.09.2015 - 13008/13

    KOVYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

    ALEKSANDR NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 30155/05

    VERESHCHAGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 59297/09

    POLOMKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 50992/16

    KULMINSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht