Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 04.09.2019

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,14724
EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11 (https://dejure.org/2013,14724)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 02.07.2013 - 41838/11 (https://dejure.org/2013,14724)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 02. Juli 2013 - 41838/11 (https://dejure.org/2013,14724)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,14724) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    R.Sz. v. HUNGARY

    Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
    Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions) Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (31)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

  • EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88

    HENTRICH v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    In the context of tax collection, the Court considers that the suitability of methods is a consideration in the establishment of proportionality of a measure of interference (see, in the context of exercise of the State's right of pre-emption, Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 48, Series A no. 296 A).
  • EGMR, 21.05.2002 - 28856/95

    JOKELA v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    It has already held that an interference cannot be legitimate in the absence of adversarial proceedings that comply with the principle of equality of arms, enabling argument to be presented on the issues relevant for the outcome of a case (see Hentrich, cited above, § 42; and Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002-IV).
  • EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

    CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    In determining whether this requirement is met, the Court reiterates that the State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation with regard both to choosing the means of enforcement and to ascertaining whether the consequences of enforcement are justified in the general interest for the purpose of achieving the object of the law in question (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 75, ECHR 1999-III, and Herrmann v. Germany [GC], no. 9300/07, § 74, 26 June 2012).
     
  • EGMR, 07.06.2012 - 38433/09

    CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    In particular, a rule is "foreseeable" when it affords a measure of protection against arbitrary interferences by the public authorities (see Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 143, ECHR-2012).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

    LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    The Court recalls that the situation envisaged in the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 is only a particular instance of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property as guaranteed by the general rule set forth in the first sentence (see, for example, Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, § 106, Series A no. 102).
  • EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 20844/09

    HASANI v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    Furthermore, a legislative amendment which removes a legitimate expectation may amount in its own right to an interference with "possessions" (see, mutatis mutandis, Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810/03, §§ 67-71 and 79, ECHR 2005-IX; Draon v. France [GC], no. 1513/03, §§ 70-72, 6 October 2005; and Hasani v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20844/09, 30 September 2010).
  • EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 75909/01

    Sud Fondi S.r.l. u.a. ./. Italien

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    As to the notion of "foreseeability", its scope depends to a considerable degree on the content of the instrument in issue, the field it is designed to cover and the number and status of those to whom it is addressed (see, mutatis mutandis, Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, § 109, 20 January 2009).
  • BVerfG, 22.06.1995 - 2 BvL 37/91

    Einheitswerte II

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    The overall tax burden should moreover not run counter to the principle of equality demanding the division of burden depending on the contributing capacity (BVerfG, 2 BvL 37/91, 22.6.1995).
  • BVerfG, 18.01.2006 - 2 BvR 2194/99

    Halbteilungsgrundsatz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    In its subsequent decision of 18 January 2006 (BVerfG, 2 BvR 2194/99, 18.01.2006), the Federal Constitutional Court found that even though tax load fell within the ambit of Article 14 of the Basic Law, that is, the protection of property, the overall burden through business and personal income tax, in the particular circumstances, did not infringe the complainant's right to property.
  • EuGH, 12.10.2010 - C-499/08

    Es stellt eine Diskriminierung aufgrund des Alters dar, wenn einem Arbeitnehmer …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 41838/11
    The European Court of Justice held in Case C-499/08 Andersen v Region Syddanmark, [2010] ECR I-09343 as follows:.
  • EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

    SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  • EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91

    AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

    AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 23682/13

    GUBERINA v. CROATIA

    However, any such measures must be implemented in a non-discriminatory manner and comply with the requirements of proportionality (see R.Sz. v. Hungary, no. 41838/11, § 54, 2 July 2013).
  • EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 65499/11

    KEPECS v. HUNGARY

    For relevant domestic law, see the judgments N.K.M. v. Hungary (no. 66529/11, §§ 8-19, 14 May 2013); Gáll v. Hungary (no. 49570/11, §§ 8-18, 25 June 2013) and R.Sz. v. Hungary (no. 41838/11, §§ 8-17, 2 July 2013).

    The Court observes that virtually identical circumstances gave rise to a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the case of R.Sz. v. Hungary (no. 41838/11, §§ 54-62, 2 July 2013) and is satisfied that there is no reason to hold otherwise in the present application.

  • EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 44197/11

    PATARICZA v. HUNGARY

    For relevant domestic law, see the judgments N.K.M. v. Hungary (no. 66529/11, §§ 8-19, 14 May 2013); Gáll v. Hungary (no. 49570/11, §§ 8-18, 25 June 2013) and R.Sz. v. Hungary (no. 41838/11, §§ 8-17, 2 July 2013).

    The Court observes that virtually identical circumstances gave rise to a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the case of R.Sz. v. Hungary (no. 41838/11, §§ 54-62, 2 July 2013) and is satisfied that there is no reason to hold otherwise in the present application.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 04.09.2019 - 66529/11, 22193/11, 54333/13, 921/14, 52257/11, 67587/11, 41281/13, 71323/13, 49570/11, 44360/13, 71256/11, 57053/12, 65499/11, 59373/13, 65245/11, 58689/11, 42597/13, 61940/13, 33800/12, 44197/11, 44362/13, 18229/11, 21834/14, 41838/11, 41274/13, 42606/1   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,29005
EGMR, 04.09.2019 - 66529/11, 22193/11, 54333/13, 921/14, 52257/11, 67587/11, 41281/13, 71323/13, 49570/11, 44360/13, 71256/11, 57053/12, 65499/11, 59373/13, 65245/11, 58689/11, 42597/13, 61940/13, 33800/12, 44197/11, 44362/13, 18229/11, 21834/14, 41838/11, 41274/13, 42606/1 (https://dejure.org/2019,29005)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04.09.2019 - 66529/11, 22193/11, 54333/13, 921/14, 52257/11, 67587/11, 41281/13, 71323/13, 49570/11, 44360/13, 71256/11, 57053/12, 65499/11, 59373/13, 65245/11, 58689/11, 42597/13, 61940/13, 33800/12, 44197/11, 44362/13, 18229/11, 21834/14, 41838/11, 41274/13, 42606/1 (https://dejure.org/2019,29005)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 04. September 2019 - 66529/11, 22193/11, 54333/13, 921/14, 52257/11, 67587/11, 41281/13, 71323/13, 49570/11, 44360/13, 71256/11, 57053/12, 65499/11, 59373/13, 65245/11, 58689/11, 42597/13, 61940/13, 33800/12, 44197/11, 44362/13, 18229/11, 21834/14, 41838/11, 41274/13, 42606/1 (https://dejure.org/2019,29005)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,29005) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    N.K.M. CONTRE LA HONGRIE ET 32 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    N.K.M. AGAINST HUNGARY AND 32 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 66529/11
  • EGMR, 04.09.2019 - 66529/11, 22193/11, 54333/13, 921/14, 52257/11, 67587/11, 41281/13, 71323/13, 49570/11, 44360/13, 71256/11, 57053/12, 65499/11, 59373/13, 65245/11, 58689/11, 42597/13, 61940/13, 33800/12, 44197/11, 44362/13, 18229/11, 21834/14, 41838/11, 41274/13, 42606/1
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)

  • EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 63066/14

    Schuldenschnitt in Griechenland: Die Umschuldung war legal

    La Cour rappelle en outre qu'elle a déjà construit une jurisprudence relative à la marge d'appréciation des États dans le contexte de la crise économique qui sévit en Europe depuis 2008 et plus particulièrement en relation avec des mesures d'austérité prises par voie législative ou autre et visant des couches entières de la population (Valkov et autres c. Bulgarie, no 2033/04, 25 octobre 2011, Frimu et 4 autres requêtes c. Roumanie (déc.), nos 45312/11, 45581/11, 45583/11, 45587/11 et 45588/11, § 40, 7 février 2012, Panfile c. Roumanie (déc.), no 13902/11, 20 mars 2012, Koufaki et ADEDY c. Grèce (déc.), nos 57665/12 et 57657/12, 7 mai 2013, N.K.M. c. Hongrie, no 66529/11, 14 mai 2013, da Conceição Mateus et Santos Januário c. Portugal (déc.), nos 62235/12 et 57725/12, 8 octobre 2013, Savickas c. Lituanie (déc.), no 66365/09, 15 octobre 2013, et da Silva Carvalho Rico c. Portugal (déc.), no 13341/14, 1er septembre 2015).
  • EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 64806/16

    MAROSLAVAC v. CROATIA

    Furthermore, there is nothing to indicate, nor has it been suggested by the applicant, that the levying of such a sum in profit tax fundamentally undermined her financial situation or that of her notary office - one of the factors to which the Court has given weight when gauging whether a fair balance has been struck in a given case (see N.K.M. v. Hungary, no. 66529/11, § 42, 14 May 2013; Cacciato v. Italy (dec.), no. 60633/16, 16 January 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht