Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  URAZOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 42147/05

  For the relevant provisions of domestic law and practice and relevant international material and practice see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia ([GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 53-76, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).

  The judgment closely follows the reasoning in Svinarenko and Slyadnev ([GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 53-76, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 42147/05

  Irrespective of the reasons for that failure, the Court is prepared to draw inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations and the Government's conduct in the instant case (see Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420/01, § 115, 2 September 2010, with further references, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 124, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

  KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 42147/05

  In the absence of any explanation from the Government, the Court is unable to establish whether their failure is a product of the domestic authorities" inability to keep a comprehensive record concerning the applicant's state of health and the treatment he received (see, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)) or their unwillingness to disclose the contents of the applicant's medical record which might contain information capable of corroborating the allegations put forward by the applicant.

 
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 43231/04

  KOPANITSYN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 42147/05

  To this end, the Court will examine the declaration in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI, and Kopanitsyn v. Russia, no. 43231/04, §§ 23-32, 12 March 2015, with further references).
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 28018/05

  STRELETS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 42147/05

  The Court further notes that it has repeatedly found violations of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of keeping defendants in detention without a specific legal basis or clear rules governing their situation (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 144-51, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), and Moskovets v. Russia, no. 14370/03, §§ 62-65, 23 April 2009) or without indicating any particular reason for the decision to maintain a custodial measure or setting a specific time-limit for the continued detention or for a periodic review of the preventive measure (see Strelets v. Russia, no. 28018/05, §§ 71-73, 6 November 2012, with extensive further references).
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 14370/03

  MOSKOVETS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 42147/05

  The Court further notes that it has repeatedly found violations of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of keeping defendants in detention without a specific legal basis or clear rules governing their situation (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 144-51, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), and Moskovets v. Russia, no. 14370/03, §§ 62-65, 23 April 2009) or without indicating any particular reason for the decision to maintain a custodial measure or setting a specific time-limit for the continued detention or for a periodic review of the preventive measure (see Strelets v. Russia, no. 28018/05, §§ 71-73, 6 November 2012, with extensive further references).

• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 13567/13

  BURKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012, as regards unreasonably long detention on remand; Yaroslav Belousov, cited above, §§ 145-53, and Urazov v. Russia, no. 42147/05, §§ 85-90, 14 June 2016, concerning the impact of the applicants' confinement in a metal cage or a glass cabin on the exercise of their rights to participate effectively in the proceedings and to receive practical and effective legal assistance; Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015, and Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no. 36658/05, §§ 150-59, 18 December 2018, relating to impossibility to question witnesses in a criminal trial; Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 2335/09

  TKACHUK c. RUSSIE

  Elle a réitéré cette conclusion dans ses arrêts ultérieurs (Urazov c. Russie, no 42147/05, §§ 81-83, 14 juin 2016, et Vorontsov et autres c Russie, nos 59655/14 et 2 autres, § 31, 31 janvier 2017).
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 67312/12

  FIRSTOV c. RUSSIE

  Elle a réitéré cette conclusion dans les arrêts Urazov c. Russie (no 42147/05, §§ 85-89, 14 juin 2016, §§ 85-89) et Rodionov c. Russie (no 9106/09, §§ 171-174, 11 décembre 2018) ainsi que, dans le contexte du recours à des cabines vitrées, dans les arrêts Yaroslav Belousov c. Russie (nos 2653/13 et 60980/14, §§ 145-154, 4 octobre 2016) et Mariya Alekhina et autres c. Russie (no 38004/12, §§ 166-172, 17 juillet 2018).
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 22935/10

  ZVYAGIN v. RUSSIA

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the conditions of transport (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 112-20, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Guliyev v. Russia, no. 24650/02, §§ 47-70, 19 June 2008; Starokadomskiy v. Russia, no. 42239/02, §§ 53-60, 31 July 2008; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012; and M.S. v. Russia, no. 8589/08, §§ 78-79, 10 July 2014) and the confinement of defendants in metal cages in courtrooms (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 122-39, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and Urazov v. Russia, no. 42147/05, §§ 81-92, 14 June 2016).