Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 42320/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,31966) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 42320/98
Wird zitiert von ... (11)
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64886/01
COCCHIARELLA v. ITALY
Indeed, it cannot be ruled out that excessive delays in an action for compensation will render the remedy inadequate (see Paulino Tomás v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII; Belinger v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001; and, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 156, ECHR 2004-XII). - EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65102/01
GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 2)
Indeed, it cannot be ruled out that excessive delays in an action for compensation will affect whether the remedy is an adequate one (see Paulino Tomas v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII; Belinger v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001; and, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 156, ECHR 2004-XII). - EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 62361/00
RICCARDI PIZZATI c. ITALIE
On ne peut en effet exclure que la lenteur excessive du recours indemnitaire n'en affecte le caractère adéquat (Paulino Tomas c. Portugal (déc.), no 58698/00, CEDH 2003-VIII, Belinger c. Slovénie, (déc.), no 42320/98, 2 octobre 2001 et, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız c. Turquie [GC], no 48939/99, § 156, CEDH 2004-XII).
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64897/01
ERNESTINA ZULLO c. ITALIE
On ne peut en effet exclure que la lenteur excessive du recours indemnitaire n'en affecte le caractère adéquat (Paulino Tomas c. Portugal (déc.), no 58698/00, CEDH 2003-VIII, Belinger c. Slovénie, (déc.), no 42320/98, 2 octobre 2001 et, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız c. Turquie [GC], no 48939/99, § 156, CEDH 2004-XII). - EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 65075/01
GIUSEPPINA AND ORESTINA PROCACCINI v. ITALY
Indeed, it cannot be ruled out that excessive delays in an action for compensation will affect whether the remedy is an adequate one (see Paulino Tomas v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII; Belinger v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001; and, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 156, ECHR 2004-XII). - EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64705/01
GIUSEPPE MOSTACCIUOLO v. ITALY (No. 1)
On ne peut en effet exclure que la lenteur excessive du recours indemnitaire n'en affecte le caractère adéquat (Paulino Tomas c. Portugal (déc.), no 58698/00, CEDH 2003-VIII, Belinger c. Slovénie, (déc.), no 42320/98, 2 octobre 2001 et, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız c. Turquie [GC], no 48939/99, § 156, CEDH 2004-XII). - EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64699/01
MUSCI v. ITALY
Indeed, it cannot be ruled out that excessive delays in an action for compensation will affect whether the remedy is an adequate one (see Paulino Tomas v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII; Belinger v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001; and, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 156, ECHR 2004-XII). - EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 64890/01
APICELLA v. ITALY
Indeed, it cannot be ruled out that excessive delays in an action for compensation will affect whether the remedy is an adequate one (see Paulino Tomas v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII; Belinger v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001; and, mutatis mutandis, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 156, ECHR 2004-XII). - EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
GRASSER v. GERMANY
A remedy which will not bear fruit in sufficient time cannot be regarded as effective (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 22, § 47; Belinger v. Slovenia, no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001). - EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 44581/98
GERDEN v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 69319/12
HAJRUDINOVIC v. SLOVENIA
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,46193) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BELINGER v. SLOVENIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 42320/98
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 19.02.1998 - 26102/95
DALIA v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter alia, the Vernillo v. France judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27, and Dalia v. France, no. 26102/95, § 38, ECHR 1998-I). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
The purpose of Article 35 § 1, which sets out the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies, is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, as recent authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-...). - EGMR, 02.12.1999 - 32082/96
Überprüfung der Länge eines in Portugal anhängigen Strafverfahrens durch den …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
Nor could the supervisory appeal give rise to any finding as to the length of the proceedings as a whole, or provide redress, in the form of compensation for example, for any unreasonable delay to date (cf., Holzinger v. Austria cited above, Gonzalez Marin v. Spain (dec.), no. 39521/98, ECHR 1999-VII, and Tomé Mota v. Portugal (dec.), no. 32082/96, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
The purpose of Article 35 § 1, which sets out the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies, is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, as recent authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-...). - EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 42320/98
According to the Court's settled case-law, a remedy which will not bear fruit in sufficient time does not fall within the category of effective remedies which Article 35 would oblige the applicants to exhaust (see, mutatis mutandis, the Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, pp. 21-22, § 47).
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
In der Folge hat der Gerichtshof Rechtsbehelfe gegen die Verfahrensdauer in einigen Mitgliedstaaten auf ihre Wirksamkeit i.S. von Art. 13 EMRK genauer überprüft (s. u.a. EGMR, Entsch. v. 2.10.2001 - 42320/98 - Belinger/Slowenien, unveröff.; EGMR, Slg. 2002-IX - Andrasik u.a./Slowakei; EGMR, Slg. 2002-VII - Slavicek/Kroatien; EGMR, Slg. 2002-IX - Fernandez-Molina Gonzalez u.a./Spanien; EGMR, Slg. 2003-X - Doran/Irland; EGMR, Slg. 2003-VIII - Hartman/Tschechien; EGMR, Slg. 2003-VIII - Paulino Tomas/Portugal; EGMR, Entsch. v. 29.1. 2004 - 53084/99 - Kormatcheva/Russland, unveröff; EGMR, Entsch. v. 15.3. 2005 - 60227/00 - Bako/Slowakei, unveröff.; EGMR, Slg. 2005-V - Charzynski/Polen; EGMR, Slg. 2005-X - Lukenda/Slowenien).