Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (18) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85
Oberschlick ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98
In arriving at this conclusion, the Supreme Court had guidance from the present Court's established case-law under Article 10 of the Convention, according to which the limits of acceptable criticism are wider with regard to a politician than as regards a private individual (see, among others, the Lingens v. Austria judgment of 22 November 1990, Series A no. 204, p. 27, § 42). - EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 16213/90
BURGHARTZ c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98
The Court considers that the notion of private life includes elements relating to a person's identity, such as a person's name (see the Burghartz v. Switzerland judgment of 22 Feburay 1994, Series A no. 280-B, p. 28, § 24), or, as in the present case, a person's picture. - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98
As to the applicant's complaint that the Supreme Court wrongly regarded the impugned statement as a value judgment and failed to give reasons in this respect, the Court recalls that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain, [GC] no. 30544/96 § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 61496/08
Überwachung privater Chatnachrichten des Arbeitnehmers durch den Arbeitgeber
The Court notes, for example, that in some previous cases concerning the protection of a person's picture against abuse by others, the remedies available in the member States have been of a civil-law nature, possibly combined with procedural remedies such as the granting of an injunction (see, inter alia, Von Hannover, cited above; Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, 15 January 2009; and Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002) (Söderman, cited above, § 85). - EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 1874/13
LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
The concept of private life extends to aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's name or picture (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002; and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004-VI). - EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 420/07
Vereinbarkeit einer vom Arbeitgeber angeordneten und durch eine Detektei …
The Court reiterates that the concept of private life extends to aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's name or picture (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002, and von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004-VI).
- EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13
LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
It extends in particular to aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's name or picture (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002, and Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 5786/08
Gesetzeslücke: Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Schweden wegen Nacktaufnahmen
La Cour observe, par exemple, que dans certaines affaires précédentes relatives à la protection de l'image d'une personne contre des abus de la part d'autrui, les recours existants dans les Etats membres étaient d'ordre civil, parfois combinés à des voies procédurales telles que le prononcé d'une interdiction (voir, parmi d'autres, Von Hannover c. Allemagne (no 2), précité, Reklos et Davourlis c. Grèce, no 1234/05, 15 janvier 2009, et Schüssel c. Autriche (déc.), no 42409/98, 21 février 2002).Concernant les images de personnes publiques, voir Schüssel c. Autriche (déc.), no 42409/98, 21 février 2002, Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG c. Autriche, no 34315/96, § 37, 26 février 2002, et Von Hannover, précité, § 57 ; pour les images d'individus qui ne sont pas des personnes publiques, voir Sciacca c. Italie, no 50774/99, § 28, CEDH 2005-I, et Reklos et Davourlis, précité, § 35.
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 12556/03
PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA
La Cour a jugé que la publication de la photographie d'une personne relevait de sa vie privée même si l'intéressé était un personnage public (Schüssel c. Autriche (déc.), no 42409/98, 21 février 2002, et Von Hannover précité, § 53). - EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 10764/09
Keine Bedenken gegen Dashcam-Videos vor Gericht?
La publication d'une photo interfère dès lors avec la vie privée d'une personne, même si cette personne est une personne publique (Schüssel c. Autriche (déc.), no 42409/98, 21 février 2002). - EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 56925/08
BÉDAT c. SUISSE
That also applies to the protection of a person's picture against abuse by third parties (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002; Von Hannover, cited above, § 57; Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, § 35, 15 January 2009; and Von Hannover (no. 2), cited above, § 98). - EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 39311/05
KARAKO v. HUNGARY
However, the Court said at § 50 of that judgment that the concept of private life "extends to aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's name (see Burghartz v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 280-B, p. 28, § 24), or a person's picture (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002)".In § 34 of the Pfeifer judgment, the Court found that the publication of a person's photograph fell within the scope of his or her private life even where the person concerned was a public figure (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002, and Von Hannover, cited above, § 53).
- EGMR, 16.04.2009 - 34438/04
EGELAND AND HANSEID v. NORWAY
The Court reiterates that the notion of private life in Article 8 of the Convention extends to a person's identity, such as a person's name or a person's picture (Von Hannover , cited above, § 50; see also Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002). - EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 50774/99
SCIACCA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 40454/07
COUDERC AND HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIÉS v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01
HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 78060/01
PETRINA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 1234/05
REKLOS ET DAVOURLIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 26968/16
FLORINDO DE ALMEIDA VASCONCELOS GRAMAXO c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 1234/05
REKLOS ET DAVOURLIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
ANGUELOV v. BULGARIA