Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RZAKHANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Rzakhanov v. Azerbaijan

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 4242/07
• EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

  When assessing conditions of detention, one must consider their cumulative effects as well as the applicant's specific allegations (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

  Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of this provision (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Rohde v. Denmark, no. 69332/01, § 90, 21 July 2005).
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  CARDOT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

  It normally requires also that complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, inter alia, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200).

 
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 52750/99

  LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

  In assessing whether such a measure may fall within the ambit of Article 3 in a given case, regard must be had to the particular conditions, the stringency of the measure, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Lorsé and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 52750/99, § 63, 4 February 2003).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 18.01.2017 - 41576/98

  GANCI ET 12 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 4242/07

  The Court further notes that removal from association with other prisoners for security, disciplinary or protective reasons does not in itself amount to inhuman treatment or degrading punishment (see Messina v. Italy (dec.), no. 25498/94, ECHR 1999-V) and solitary confinement is not in itself in breach of Article 3 (see Rohde, cited above, § 93).

• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 19090/20

  FENECH v. MALTA

  The Court reiterates that removal from association with other prisoners for security, disciplinary or protective reasons does not in itself amount to inhuman treatment or degrading punishment and solitary confinement is not in itself in breach of Article 3. In assessing whether solitary confinement falls within the ambit of Article 3, regard must be had to the particular conditions, the stringency of the measure, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Rohde v. Denmark, no. 69332/01, § 93, 21 July 2005, and Rzakhanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4242/07, § 64, 4 July 2013).
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 3501/20

  SCHMIDT AND SMIGOL v. ESTONIA

  While extended removal from association with others is undesirable, whether such a measure falls within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention depends on the particular conditions, the stringency of the measure, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Rohde v. Denmark, no. 69332/01, § 93, 21 July 2005, and Rzakhanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4242/07, § 64, 4 July 2013).
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 38321/17

  MASLÁK v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)

  Moreover, the Court reiterates that solitary confinement is not in itself in breach of Article 3. While extended removal from association with others is undesirable, whether such a measure falls within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention depends on the particular conditions, the stringency of the measure, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Rohde, cited above, § 93, and Rzakhanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4242/07, § 64, 4 July 2013).
• EGMR, 18.04.2023 - 43966/19

  N.M. c. BELGIQUE

  Si l'éloignement prolongé de toute relation avec autrui n'est pas souhaitable, la question de savoir si une telle mesure relève de l'article 3 dépend des conditions particulières, de la rigueur de la mesure, de sa durée, de l'objectif poursuivi et de ses effets sur la personne concernée (Rohde c. Danemark, no 69332/01, § 93, 21 juillet 2005, et Rzakhanov c. Azerbaïdjan, no 4242/07, § 64, 4 juillet 2013).
• EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 46903/07

  MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  It also found that under the Azerbaijani law institution of civil or administrative proceedings before the domestic courts constituted an effective remedy in respect of the complaints concerning the alleged lack of medical assistance or the conditions of detention (see Insanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16133/08, §§ 86-98, 14 March 2013, and Rzakhanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4242/07, §§ 26-34, 4 July 2013).