Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SALIBA v. MALTA
Art. 7, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 4251/02
- EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 38602/02
YILDIRIM contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02
Accordingly, it cannot be concluded that the order in issue involved a finding of guilt pursuant to a criminal charge; it therefore did not constitute a "penalty" within the meaning of Article 7 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yildirim v. Italy (Dec.), no. 38602/02, CEDH 2003-IV; M. v. Italy, no. 12386/86, Commission decision of 15 April 1991, Decisions and Reports (DR) 70, pp. - EKMR, 15.04.1991 - 12386/86
M. contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02
Accordingly, it cannot be concluded that the order in issue involved a finding of guilt pursuant to a criminal charge; it therefore did not constitute a "penalty" within the meaning of Article 7 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yildirim v. Italy (Dec.), no. 38602/02, CEDH 2003-IV; M. v. Italy, no. 12386/86, Commission decision of 15 April 1991, Decisions and Reports (DR) 70, pp. - EGMR, 09.02.1995 - 17440/90
WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02
The wording of that provision indicates that the starting-point in any assessment of the existence of a penalty is whether the measure in issue is imposed following conviction for a "criminal offence" (see Welch v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307-A, p. 13, § 28).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SALIBA v. MALTA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
No violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 4251/02
- EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 26.10.2004 - 27265/95
TERAZZI S.R.L. c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
There is therefore no room for the application of the second sentence of the first paragraph in the present case (see, mutatis mutandis, Terazzi v. Italy, no. 27265/95, § 61, 17 October 2002).The Court considers that, in an area as complex and difficult as that of the development of the countryside, the Contracting States should enjoy a wide margin of appreciation in order to implement their town and country-planning policy (see Terazzi S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 27265/95, § 85, 17 October 2002, and Elia S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 37710/97, § 77, ECHR 2001-IX).
- EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 50924/99
BAHIA NOVA S.A. contre l'ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
This corresponds to the general interest of the community (see, mutatis mutandis, Cooperativa La Laurentina v. Italy, no. 23529/94, § 94, 2 August 2001; Bahia Nova S.A. (dec.), no. 50924/99, 12 December 2000; Chapman v. the United Kingdom, no. 27238/95, § 82, ECHR 2001-I). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
The principle of the rule of law only precludes interferences by the legislature - other than on compelling grounds of the general interest - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see, with reference to Article 6 of the Convention, Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 82, § 49; Papageorgiou v. Greece, judgment of 22 October 1997, Reports 1997-VI, p. 2288, § 37; National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 October 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2363, § 112).
- EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
Moreover, the requirement of lawfulness means that rules of domestic law must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable (see Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, pp. 19-20, § 42, and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 47, § 110). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
Moreover, the requirement of lawfulness means that rules of domestic law must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable (see Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, pp. 19-20, § 42, and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 47, § 110). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
Since the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are "practical and effective", it has to be ascertained whether that situation amounted to a de facto expropriation (see, among other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, pp. 24-25, § 63, and Vasilescu v. Romania, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1078, § 51).
- EGMR, 27.10.2016 - 27662/09
KANAGINIS c. GRÈCE
Il appartient ainsi à la Cour de vérifier, dans le cas d'espèce, que l'équilibre voulu a été préservé de manière compatible avec le droit du requérant au respect de ses biens (voir Saliba c. Malte, no 4251/02, § 45, 8 novembre 2005, et Housing Association of War Disabled et Victims of War of Attica et autres c. Grèce, no 35859/02, § 37, 13 juillet 2006).
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 4251/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SALIBA v. MALTA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 7, Art. 3 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 4251/02
- EGMR, 23.11.2004 - 4251/02
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 4251/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 4251/02
Factors such as the nature and context of the punishment, the manner and method of its execution, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim must all be taken into account (see Costello-Roberts v. United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 59, § 30).