Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IZCI v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IZCI v. TURKEY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05

  EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court has examined the applicant's complaints in the light of the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 of the Convention (see, in particular, Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 35-44, ECHR 2006-XIII, and the judgments cited therein; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, §§ 33-39, ECHR 2007-IX; Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, §§ 23-46, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05

  The Court reiterates that law-enforcement officers, such as the police or the gendarmerie, should not be left in a vacuum when performing their duties, whether in the context of a prepared operation or a spontaneous chase of a person perceived to be dangerous: a legal and administrative framework should define the limited circumstances in which law-enforcement officials may use force and firearms, in the light of the international standards which have been developed in this respect (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 59, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that the undeniable difficulties inherent in the fight against crime cannot justify placing limits on the protection to be afforded in respect of the physical integrity of individuals (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336 and the case cited therein).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

  OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court has examined the applicant's complaints in the light of the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 of the Convention (see, in particular, Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 35-44, ECHR 2006-XIII, and the judgments cited therein; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, §§ 33-39, ECHR 2007-IX; Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, §§ 23-46, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04

  BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court has examined the applicant's complaints in the light of the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 of the Convention (see, in particular, Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 35-44, ECHR 2006-XIII, and the judgments cited therein; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, §§ 33-39, ECHR 2007-IX; Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, §§ 23-46, 7 October 2008).

• EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 29580/12

  Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny

  In particular, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Oya Ataman, cited above, § 42; Bukta and Others, cited above, § 37; Nurettin Aldemir and Others, cited above, § 46; Ashughyan, cited above, § 90; Éva Molnár, cited above, § 36; Barraco, cited above, § 43; Berladir and Others, cited above, § 38; Fáber, cited above, § 47; Izci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 89, 23 July 2013; and Kasparov and Others, cited above, § 91).
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05

  KUDREVICIUS ET AUTRES c. LITUANIE

  In particular, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Oya Ataman, cited above, § 42; Bukta and Others, cited above, § 37; Nurettin Aldemir and Others, cited above, § 46; Ashughyan, cited above, § 90; Éva Molnár, cited above, § 36; Barraco, cited above, § 43; Berladir and Others, cited above, § 38; Fáber, cited above, § 47; Izci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 89, 23 July 2013; and Kasparov and Others, cited above, § 91).
• EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09

  MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  [25] See Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004; Yeter v. Turkey, no. 33750/03, § 70, 13 January 2009; and Ä°zci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 73, 23 July 2013.

 
• EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09

  Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte

  The Court has already found in a number of cases where the authorities" failure to show diligence resulted in the prosecution becoming time-barred that the effectiveness of the investigation was irreparably damaged and the purpose of effective protection against acts of ill-treatment was frustrated (see, among many other authorities, V.K. v. Russia, no. 68059/13, § 189, 7 March 2017; Izci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 72, 23 July 2013; Yazici and Others v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 45046/05, § 27, 23 April 2013; Ablyazov v. Russia, no. 22867/05, §§ 57 and 59, 30 October 2012; Nikiforov v. Russia, no. 42837/04, § 54, 1 July 2010; and Beganovic v. Croatia, no. 46423/06, § 85, 25 June 2009).
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In particular, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Oya Ataman, cited above, § 42; Bukta and Others, cited above, § 37; Nurettin Aldemir and Others, cited above, § 46; Ashughyan, cited above, § 90; Éva Molnár, cited above, § 36; Barraco, cited above, § 43; Berladir and Others, cited above, § 38; Fáber, cited above, § 47; Izci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 89, 23 July 2013; and Kasparov and Others, cited above, § 91).
• EGMR, 13.02.2014 - 66393/10

  TALI v. ESTONIA

  Pepper spray should never be deployed against a prisoner who has already been brought under control (see Ä°zci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, §§ 40-41, 23 July 2013, and Ali Günes v. Turkey, no. 9829/07, §§ 39-40, 10 April 2012; see also paragraph 52 above).
• EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08

  ATAYKAYA c. TURQUIE

  Ces constatations ont été complétées par l'arrêt Ä°zci c. Turquie (no 42606/05, § 99, 23 juillet 2013), dans lequel la Cour a précisé qu'il était crucial que des règles claires fussent adoptées en la matière et que fût mis en place un système à même de garantir une formation adéquate du personnel et le contrôle et la surveillance de ce personnel au cours de manifestations, ainsi qu'un examen ex post facto efficace de la nécessité, de la proportionnalité et du caractère raisonnable de tout recours à la force, en particulier contre les personnes qui ne s'opposent pas aux forces de l'ordre de manière violente.
• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 15367/14

  SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  In particular, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Oya Ataman, cited above, § 42; Bukta and Others, cited above, § 37; Nurettin Aldemir and Others, cited above, § 46; Ashughyan, cited above, § 90; Éva Molnár, cited above, § 36; Barraco, cited above, § 43; Berladir and Others, cited above, § 38; Fáber, cited above, § 47; Izci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 89, 23 July 2013; and Kasparov and Others, cited above, § 91).
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 37795/13

  TEKIN ET ARSLAN c. BELGIQUE

  La Cour relève d'ailleurs que le Gouvernement n'a pas cherché à démontrer qu'il existait au moment des faits des instructions claires et adéquates relatives aux techniques manuelles de maîtrise de détenus (mutatis mutandis, Izci c. Turquie, no 42606/05, §§ 64-65, 23 juillet 2013).
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 37273/10

  SÜLEYMAN ÇELEBI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  La Cour note que les interventions des forces de l'ordre manu militari dans les manifestations et, en particulier, l'utilisation des munitions lacrymogènes ont déjà fait l'objet de l'application de l'article 46 (Ataykaya c. Turquie, no 50275/08, §§ 66-75, 22 juillet 2014, et Izci c. Turquie, no 42606/05, §§ 94-99, 23 juillet 2013).
• EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 64937/19

  ELVAN c. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 66568/09

  KARS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 20347/07

  EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKÇILERI SENDIKASI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 26.05.2015 - 25595/08

  SONGÜL INCE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.10.2019 - 77832/12

  KÖKLÜ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 10443/12

  GEYLANI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 35729/12

  BARTA AND DRAJKÓ v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 8077/08

  SAKIR KAÇMAZ v. TURKEY